Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
There are still numerous incompatibilities in the definitions of basic dermatological terms. In Spain, the problem is aggravated by the coexistence and conflict between two different semantic models, imported from other countries (France and the USA). These two models really have different "units": one model can be called "essentialist" and the other "nominalist". These models are not original to Spain; rather, each one shows the predominance or influence of an outside culture. Through a historical and evolutional study, we were able to verify that the origin of these semantic models goes back to Joseph Plenck and Robert Willan (essentialist model) and to Ferdinand Hebra (nominalist model), respectively. An analysis of these models from a historical perspective may help in understanding the origin of the current conflicts in the everyday use of Spanish dermatological semiology, and may therefore help resolve them.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0001-7310(06)73373-7 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!