We examined self- and cross-citation practices in JABA and JEAB from 1983 through 1992. Mean levels of self-citation for JABA and for JEAB were 22.6% and 36.1%, respectively. Overall, 2.4% of JABA citations were JEAB articles, and 0.6% of JEAB citations were JABA articles, which suggests limited integration of basic and applied research.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1297857 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1994.27-729 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
International publication trends in basic, applied, and conceptual behavior-analytic journals.
J Appl Behav Anal
June 2023
Department of Special Education and Literacy Studies, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, USA.
The analysis of international and collaborative publication trends in prominent behavior-analytic journals has been a topic of interest for behavioral researchers. This paper focuses on publication trends from 1997 through 2020 in three prominent journals: Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior (JEAB), Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (JABA), and Perspectives on Behavior Science (PBS). The variable of interest was the percentage of articles published per geographical category-Australasia/East Asia, Europe, Latin America, Middle East, North America, and Africa.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFArticle Synopsis
- - The study analyzed self- and cross-citations in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (JABA) and Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior (JEAB) from 2004 to 2018, finding that JABA had a higher rate of self-citations (40.1%) compared to JEAB (28.7%).
- - A small percentage of citations in each journal were directed towards the other; JABA cited JEAB articles 5.1% of the time, while JEAB cited JABA articles 2.3%.
- - Despite low overall cross-citation rates, there's a positive trend, with around 28.7% of JABA articles and 27.5% of JEAB
A Model for Training Science-Based Practitioners in Behavior Analysis.
Behav Anal Pract
September 2018
Department of Psychology, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI 49008 USA.
Our goal should not be to train scientist-practitioners but rather to train science-based practitioners, that is practitioners who base their practice on scientifically solid, applied research; and when caught in a tight spot where there is no (JABA) research on which to depend, they base their practice on basic, scientific research, that is the (JEAB) or more realistically B. F. Skinner's pre-JEAB research.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEffective Dissemination Requires Effective Talk: a Comparison of Behavior-Analytic Journals.
Behav Anal Pract
October 2014
Department of Psychology, Eastern Connecticut State University, 83 Windham Street, Willimantic, CT 06226 USA.
We explored language used in three behavior-analytic journals (the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (JABA), the Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior (JEAB), and Behavior Analysis in Practice (BAP)) to evaluate differences in factors related to the ease of comprehension. Using a linguistic analysis tool, we compared the first three paragraphs of the introductions of research articles in ten issues of each of the journals. JEAB was found to use language that was less concrete, meaningful, and imageable than the two applied journals.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTo study the influences between basic and applied research in behavior analysis, we analyzed the coauthorship interactions of authors who published in JABA and JEAB from 1980 to 2010. We paid particular attention to authors who published in both JABA and JEAB (dual authors) as potential agents of cross-field interactions. We present a comprehensive analysis of dual authors' coauthorship interactions using social networks methodology and key word analysis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!