Introduction: The systems of calculating care load have not yet reached the levels of generalized use which the systems of prognostic estimation of survival have. The reason for this is their potential defects of design (medical and not nursing conceptualization) and the sometimes confusing completion (TISS 76). The simplest ("nine equivalents of nurse manpower use score" [NEMS], care levels) add the difficulty of not being useful for the calculation of staff, because the design is not oriented towards nursing. The development of NAS (nursing activity score) by FRICE tries to solve all these problems. Our objective has been to verify to what degree the NEMS and NAS are correlated as systems of expression and calculation of care load.
Patients And Method: During the last quarter of 2004, NEMS and NAS have been used simultaneously by the nursing staff. During this period, 150 pairs of daily calculation values of NEMS-NAS and 150 pairs of calculation values by shift of NEMS-NAS have been collected. Comparison of means and linear correlation of values obtained and the analysis of the histograms of values of each series, their value ranges and analysis of their bias coefficients have been done. The analysis was done with the SPSS/PC 11.
Results: During the period indicated, it has been verified that NEMS has a much narrower value range than NAS, both in regards to daily values (18-45 versus 29.70-84.50) and in regards to values by shift (18-45 versus 22.40-84.50). The bias analysis shows a deviation to the left of both series of values. Linear correlation between NEMS-NAS by shift shows a R2 of 0.1634 and becomes even poorer in the NEMS-NAS correlation per day with R2 of 0.2012. It should also be stressed that NEMS expresses its results in points while NAS does so in percentage of time occupied in the attention and care of the patient.
Conclusions: In this preliminary study, the better adaptation of NAS versus NEMS to real work loads of patients hospitalized in the ICU and the non-possible correlation between the values of both systems is affirmed.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1130-2399(06)73918-9 | DOI Listing |
Nurs Open
November 2024
Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical Faculty Mihajlo Pupin in Zrenjanin, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Aims: This study aimed to assess nursing workload in Cardiac Intensive Care Unit (CICU) after three cardiothoracic surgery procedures during first four postoperative days using Nursing Activities Score (NAS) and Nine Equivalents of Nursing Manpower Use Score (NEMS) systems, to compare their performance for that purpose and to investigate association between nursing workload and type of surgery.
Design: A comparative study.
Methods: The research environment includes CICU of the University Hospital for Cardiovascular Diseases in Serbia.
Truckers in the United States (U.S.) and Canada are at high risk for noncommunicable disease.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRev Esc Enferm USP
September 2021
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Porto Alegre, Escola de Medicina, Departamento de Pediatria, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Objective: To compare the nursing workload using the Nursing Activities Score (NAS), Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System-28 (TISS-28) and Nine Equivalents of Nursing Manpower Use Score (NEMS) instruments in children admitted to a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit in a university hospital.
Method: A prospective cohort study performed in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, with a sample formed of all children hospitalized during the study period. Nursing workload was evaluated using the TISS-28, NEMS and NAS instruments, and further divided into two groups: Group 1 forming a category of basic activities items and Group 2 forming a category of other support and intervention activities.
Intensive Crit Care Nurs
April 2018
Faculty of Health Sciences, University College of Southeast Norway, Drammen, Norway and Professor at Åbo Akademi University, Finland. Electronic address:
Rev Bras Enferm
November 2017
Universidad de Alicante, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Enfermería. Alicante, España.
Objective:: determine which tool (NEMS and NAS) is most suitable for use in intensive care units using a quality-based methodology.
Method:: after identifying the opportunity for improvement "Inadequacy of the NEMS for determining nursing workload in the intensive care unit (ICU)", we assessed the NEMS and the NAS, as a proposed improvement to the NEMS, using quality improvement cycles methodology based on the following criteria: measurement of daily nursing workload on a daily and shift basis; the tool encompasses all nursing activities undertaken in the ICU; and workload assessed per patient and unit.
Results:: there was no significant difference in level of compliance for the NEMS (67%).
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!