The cost of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in Italy.

Support Care Cancer

Medical Statistics Unit, Department of Internal Medicine and Public Health, University of L'Aquila, Via Pillino, 2, 63030, Spinetoli (AP), Italy.

Published: January 2007

Goals Of Work: The aim of this paper is to analyze the costs of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in Italy.

Materials And Methods: In this prospective observational study at seven public oncology centers, incidence and intensity of CINV daily for 8 days after chemotherapy in consecutive patients receiving cisplatin-containing chemotherapy were recorded. All costs related to CINV (direct medical, direct nonmedical, and indirect) were recorded (in 2003 euros).

Main Results: A total of 172 patients were enrolled; cost data were available for 168 patients. Thirty-seven percent of patients experienced acute CINV, and 57% experienced delayed CINV; 39% achieved total control, defined as no nausea, vomiting, or rescue therapy. Mean per-patient costs of acute and delayed CINV were 30.03 euro from the hospital perspective, 4.9 euro from the patient perspective, and 26.85 euro from the National Health Service (NHS) perspective. Costs of CINV were highly variable among oncology centers, largely because of differences in procedures for preventing delayed CINV. These costs were four times higher when antiemetic drugs were prescribed and paid for by the NHS than when antiemetic prophylaxis was provided directly from hospital pharmacies. Moreover, in the delayed phase, the NHS incurred a 94% increase in costs for patients without total control. Overall costs for patients who did not experience total control of CINV were 35.57 euro higher than for those who did (85% increase).

Conclusions: Costs of CINV for the Italian NHS could be reduced if hospitals furnished antiemetic prophylaxis directly to patients. Better control of both acute and delayed CINV would improve patient well-being as well as reduce the budgetary impact of CINV in Italy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00520-006-0094-xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

delayed cinv
16
nausea vomiting
12
cinv
12
costs cinv
12
total control
12
chemotherapy-induced nausea
8
costs
8
oncology centers
8
acute delayed
8
antiemetic prophylaxis
8

Similar Publications

Introduction: Data on the optimal management of patients with hematologic malignancies and chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) are lacking, particularly for multiday chemotherapy regimens. We report our institutional experience in patients with B-cell lymphoma receiving multiday dose-adjusted R-EPOCH chemotherapy utilizing two CINV prophylaxis strategies.

Methods: We performed a retrospective, single-center, cohort study evaluating hospitalized patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma receiving DA-R-EPOCH (April 2016 to October 2022).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Randomized, Phase III Trial of Mixed Formulation of Fosrolapitant and Palonosetron (HR20013) in Preventing Cisplatin-Based Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: PROFIT.

J Clin Oncol

December 2024

Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China.

Purpose: Mixed formulation of fosrolapitant and palonosetron (PALO), HR20013, is a novel fixed-dose intravenous antiemetic combination that could simultaneously antagonize neurokinin-1 and 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptors. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HR20013 plus dexamethasone (DEX) versus fosaprepitant (FAPR) plus PALO + DEX for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC).

Methods: This is a noninferiority study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The review analyzes the effectiveness of new antiemetic medications versus traditional ones for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients undergoing moderate or highly emetogenic chemotherapy.
  • It finds that novel agents like netupitant/palonosetron and olanzapine are at least as effective, if not better, than standard antiemetic treatments that use aprepitant and other agents.
  • The study calls for more direct comparisons and larger trials to further understand the benefits of these new therapies in everyday clinical practice.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Dexamethasone, commonly used to prevent nausea from chemotherapy, has side effects that prompt the search for alternatives without it.
  • This study tested the efficacy and safety of palonosetron, aprepitant, and olanzapine in chemotherapy-naïve breast cancer patients, assessing their effectiveness in controlling nausea and vomiting.
  • Results showed low total control rates (17.1%) for antiemetic therapies excluding dexamethasone, though olanzapine could be a viable replacement for patients unable to use dexamethasone.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • * A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) were conducted to compare multiple antiemetic treatments, analyzing data from 16 randomized controlled trials involving over 3,000 patients.
  • * Results indicate that NK1 antagonists combined with ondansetron are the most effective option for preventing CINV in children, particularly when given with dexamethasone, while olanzapine also shows significant benefits when added to certain regimens.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!