Background And Objective: Use of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) and angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor antagonists reduces the incidence of cardiovascular events. The cytokines macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) and transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta may exert proatherogenic and antiatherogenic effects, respectively. In this study, we examined whether treatment with a statin or an AT(1) receptor antagonist alters M-CSF and TGF-beta levels in patients with coronary artery disease.

Methods: Twenty-seven consecutive patients with coronary artery disease were randomly assigned to the following three treatment groups for 8 weeks: simvastatin 5 mg/day (n = 10); losartan 50 mg/day (n = 9); or control (usual treatment; n = 8). Blood samples were collected before and after treatment.

Results: Clinical characteristics and baseline cytokine levels were comparable among the three groups. Serum levels of M-CSF were significantly decreased only in the simvastatin group (from 403 +/- 71 to 303 +/- 116 pg/mL; p = 0.009). Plasma levels of TGF-beta were significantly increased only in the losartan group (from 5.01 +/- 1.13 to 7.50 +/- 3.83 ng/mL; p = 0.021). Simvastatin decreased serum M-CSF levels independently of changes in total cholesterol or low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol.

Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that simvastatin decreases serum levels of M-CSF while losartan increases plasma levels of TGF-beta, suggesting that the two drugs may have different anti-atherosclerotic properties.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.2165/00129784-200606030-00004DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

coronary artery
12
levels
8
cytokine levels
8
artery disease
8
at1 receptor
8
patients coronary
8
serum levels
8
levels m-csf
8
plasma levels
8
levels tgf-beta
8

Similar Publications

Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography (PET) can be used for the assessment of myocardial perfusion. Compared to other cardiac imaging techniques, notably Single Photon Emission Computer Tomography (SPECT), cardiac PET offers superior image resolution, higher accuracy, quantitative measures of myocardial perfusion, lower radiation exposure, and shorter image acquisition time. However, PET tends to be costlier and less widely available than SPECT due to the specialized equipment needed for generating the necessary radiotracers.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, necessitating advancements in diagnostic techniques. Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) has emerged as a pivotal non-invasive tool for evaluating coronary artery anatomy and detecting atherosclerotic plaque burden with high spatial resolution. This review explores the evolution of CCTA, highlighting its technological advancements, clinical applications, and challenges.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Which Test is Best for Pain in the Chest?

R I Med J (2013)

February 2025

Professor of Medicine, Clinician Educator, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University; Associate Chief, Cardiology, Brown University Health Cardiovascular Institute, Providence, Rhode Island.

Chest pain is one of the most common chief complaints seen in both the emergency department (ED) and primary care settings.1,2 It is estimated that 20-40% of the general population will suffer from chest pain at some point throughout their lives.3 Interestingly although obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) prevalence has declined, chest pain as a presenting symptom has become increasingly common over the last decade.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Update in Cardiovascular Prevention: From Risk Scores to Imaging.

R I Med J (2013)

February 2025

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Brown University, Providence RI.

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. This review explores the evolving evidence base surrounding ASCVD prevention, particularly regarding nontraditional biomarkers, risk scores, and cardiovascular imaging modalities. Additionally, this review examines cardiovascular risk scores, including the PREVENT and MESA-CHD scores, which incorporate both traditional and nontraditional factors, thereby aspiring to offer a more equitable and precise risk assessment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!