Objective: The EPHESUS study demonstrated that aldosterone blockade with eplerenone decreased mortality in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) and heart failure after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The EPHESUS pharmacoeconomic analysis was performed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of eplerenone in the Swiss setting.
Materials And Methods: A total of 6,632 patients with LVSD and heart failure after AMI were randomized to eplerenone or placebo and followed for a mean of 16 months. The co-primary endpoints were all-cause death and the composite of cardiovascular death/cardiovascular hospitalization. The evaluation of resource use included hospitalizations, outpatient services, and medications. Survival beyond the trial period was estimated using data from the Framingham Heart Study, the Saskatchewan Health database, and the Worcester Heart Attack Registry. The incremental cost-effectiveness of eplerenone in cost per life-year and quality-adjusted life-year gained was estimated. The perspective of the Swiss third party payers was used. Daily treatment costs of eplerenone were set at CHF 3.88. All other resources were valued on the basis of official tariffs. Discounting of the results was performed at a rate of 3%.
Results: The number of life-years gained with eplerenone was 0.1083 based on Framingham, 0.0661 with Saskatchewan and 0.1518 with Worcester survival estimates. Total costs were CHF 1,028 higher over the trial period in the eplerenone arm, due to drug cost. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was CHF 10,145 per life-year gained with Framingham, CHF 16,178 with Saskatchewan, and CHF 7,693 with Worcester survival estimates. The corresponding costs per QALY were CHF 15,219, CHF 23,965 and CHF 11,337, respectively.
Conclusion: Eplerenone is effective in reducing mortality and, in Switzerland, is also cost-effective in increasing years of life for patients with LVSD after AMI.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10557-006-8282-y | DOI Listing |
Value Health
October 2023
School of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia. Electronic address:
Objectives: Decision-analytic models (DAMs) with varying structures and assumptions have been applied in economic evaluations (EEs) to assist decision making for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) therapeutics. This systematic review aimed to summarize and critically appraise the EEs of guideline-directed medical therapies (GDMTs) for HFrEF.
Methods: A systematic search of English articles and gray literature, published from January 2010, was performed on databases including MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, NHSEED, health technology assessment, Cochrane Library, etc.
Med J Islam Repub Iran
January 2017
Shomal University, Amol, Iran.
No clear evidence is available on the cost-effectiveness of eplerenone in treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Thus, the present study aimed at systematically reviewing studies that have investigated this issue. This systematic review study was conducted in 2016.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClinicoecon Outcomes Res
October 2016
Department of Health Economics, National School of Public Health, Athens, Greece.
Objectives: The aim of the study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness (CE) of treatment with eplerenone versus standard care in adult patients with New York Heart Association class II chronic heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction from the perspective of the Greek national health care payer.
Methods: A discrete-event model simulating the clinical course and respective outcomes of eplerenone as an add-on to standard therapy versus standard therapy alone based on the pivotal Eplerenone in Mild Patients Hospitalization and SurvIval Study in Heart Failure (EMPHASIS-HF) trial was locally adapted for the Greek setting. Data on medications followed the resource use from eplerenone in mild patients hospitalization and survival study in heart failure and were estimated on a lifetime basis (or until discontinuation).
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs
October 2016
Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Background: Eplerenone has been demonstrated as being cost effective for the treatment of patients with systolic heart failure (HF) and mild symptoms in several jurisdictions; however, its cost effectiveness is unknown in the context of Alberta, Canada.
Methods: We used a discrete-event simulation model to compare costs and outcomes between standard care and standard care plus eplerenone for the treatment of HF with mild symptoms. We used Alberta data (whenever possible) together with a healthcare perspective, a lifetime horizon, and 3 % annual discount rate for analyses.
Medicine (Baltimore)
May 2016
From the Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine (DEPM), Monash University, Melbourne, Australia (ZA, DL), Institute of Pharmaceutical Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland (ZA), and Optum (KP), Sydney, Australia.
The objective of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of eplerenone compared with usual care in patients with chronic heart failure and New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II symptoms.A Markov model was constructed with 5 health states to reflect NYHA symptom status (Classes I-IV) and death. All subjects began in the "Class II" health state and then moved to other symptom health states or died.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!