A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Prediction of total propofol clearance based on enzyme activities in microsomes from human kidney and liver. | LitMetric

Objective: Propofol is commonly used for anesthesia and sedation in intensive care units. Approximately 53% of injected propofol is excreted in the urine as the glucuronide and 38% as hydroxylated metabolites. Liver, kidneys and intestine are suspected as clearance tissues. We investigated the contribution of the liver and kidneys to propofol metabolism in humans using an in vitro-in vivo scale up approach.

Methods: Renal tissue was obtained from five patients who received nephrectomies. Each renal hydroxylation and glucuronidation enzymatic activities in microsomal fractions from patients were performed discretely and their estimation based on the decrease of propofol concentration. Hepatic hydroxylation and glucuronidation activities were also performed separately using human liver microsomes. This estimation is based on the decrease of propofol concentration, assuming that the contribution of hydroxylation activity without NADPH-generating system and glucuronidation activity without UDPGA in each microsomal fraction are negligible. Both renal and hepatic clearances were estimated assuming a well-stirred model.

Results: Enzymatic activity of propofol oxidation in renal microsomes was negligible. Although glucuronidation activity in microsomes from kidneys was comparable to that from liver, the hepatic intrinsic clearance predicted from in vitro study was higher than that in kidneys due to the larger tissue volume and higher protein concentration. However, glucuronidation clearance in kidney is relatively similar to that in liver because of blood flow limitation of clearance in both tissues.

Conclusion: The high degree of hydroxylation activity in liver microsomes is consistent with the blood flow-limited hepatic clearance of propofol. Although the activity of propofol glucuronidation in liver is higher, glucuronidation in kidney may be a substantial contributor.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00228-006-0130-2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

propofol
9
liver
8
kidney liver
8
liver kidneys
8
hydroxylation glucuronidation
8
estimation based
8
based decrease
8
decrease propofol
8
propofol concentration
8
liver microsomes
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!