Purpose: Colonoscopic surveillance in ulcerative colitis has costs and benefits beyond cancer prevention, which might influence program efficacy. This study assesses the more intangible aspects of surveillance.
Method: A questionnaire was sent to all patients on the St. Mark's colitis surveillance program. Data on quality of life (Euroqol-5D and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), complications, and preferences for surveillance and information (Kranz Health Opinion Survey) were collated with demographics and surveillance history.
Results: Two hundred eighty-one of 329 patients (85.4 percent) responded. Median Euroqol score was 80. There were no perforations. Bleeding rate was 0.11 percent. No transfusions, endoscopic intervention, or surgeries were required. 24.0 percent were frightened before colonoscopies, correlating with anxiety (r = 0.25, P < 0.0001). 60.2 percent patients found colonoscopies comfortable; experienced colonoscopists caused less discomfort (r = 0.20, P = 0.0007). 83.8 percent patients thought they had received appropriate amounts of information. 97.8 percent patients believed surveillance important, 96.4 percent thought surveillance gave them reassurance, and 67.9 percent believed surveillance greatly reduced their cancer risk. Regarding cancer risk management, one-third of patients indicated they might not necessarily opt for surveillance in its current form.
Conclusion: Colonoscopic surveillance is well tolerated with an extremely low complication rate. Patients have a good quality of life (although lower than the general population) and believe surveillance is important and reassuring. However, many are anxious before their colonoscopy. The majority are happy with information quantity and quality, although none thought they received too much. Not all patients would necessarily opt for surveillance in its current form, and we must be willing to individualize cancer risk management to comply with patient preferences.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0546-x | DOI Listing |
J Gastroenterol Hepatol
January 2025
Department of Gastroenterology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Background And Aim: Qualitative diagnosis of ulcerative colitis-associated neoplasia (UCAN) is crucial for surveillance colonoscopy in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Although the utility of magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI) in sporadic neoplasia diagnosis has been reported, its efficacy in UCAN remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of ME-NBI for qualitative diagnosis of UCAN.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Gastroenterol Hepatol
January 2025
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, The Thai Red Cross, Bangkok, Thailand.
Background: Guidelines recommend endoscopic surveillance for gastric cancer without therapeutic intervention every 3 years in patients with high-risk gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in eradicating high-risk GIM.
Methods: This randomized self-control trial was conducted between June 2020 and February 2023.
Trials
January 2025
Department of Physiotherapy, Melbourne School of Health Science, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Background: Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) uses positive pressure to assist people with respiratory muscle weakness or severe respiratory compromise to breathe. Most people use this treatment during sleep when breathing is most susceptible to instability. The benefits of using NIV in motor neurone disease (MND) are well-established.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDiabetes Obes Metab
January 2025
School of Public Health, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
J Orthop Surg Res
January 2025
Department of Epidemiology, School of Health, Mashhad University of Medical Science, Mashhad, Iran.
Background: In order to increase the stability of tibial component in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), intramedullary stem extensions (SE) have been developed. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to address the critical knowledge gap on post-operative outcomes and complications rate comparison between tibial component with SE compared to the tibial component standard configuration (SC) in primary cemented TKA.
Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of online databases, including Pubmed, Embase, ISI Web of science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus, using the following MeSH terms, (total knee arthroplasty) OR (TKA) OR (total knee replacement) AND (Tibial stem) OR (stem extension) OR (long stem).
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!