A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Smooth ocular pursuit during the transient disappearance of an accelerating visual target: the role of reflexive and voluntary control. | LitMetric

Smooth ocular pursuit during the transient disappearance of an accelerating visual target: the role of reflexive and voluntary control.

Exp Brain Res

Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, The Henry Cotton Building, Liverpool, L3 2ET, UK.

Published: October 2006

AI Article Synopsis

  • This study explored how people predict the motion of a moving target during smooth eye tracking when the target temporarily disappears.
  • Subjects showed anticipatory eye movements before the target began moving, with these movements adjusting based on how fast the target was accelerating, especially in a blocked order of presentations.
  • Findings suggest that eye movement control relies on a more complex understanding of velocity rather than just reflexive responses, indicating that our brains create a lasting representation of target speed in both random and blocked conditions.

Article Abstract

This study examined the extent to which human subjects predict future target motion for the control of smooth ocular pursuit. Subjects were required to pursue an accelerating target (0, 4 or 8 degrees/s2) that underwent a transient occlusion, and consequently reappeared with the same or increased velocity. Presentations were received in a random or blocked order. Subjects exhibited anticipatory smooth pursuit prior to target motion onset, which in blocked presentations was scaled to the velocity generated by the target acceleration. In random presentations subjects also exhibited anticipatory smooth pursuit, but this was reflected in a more generalized response. During the transient occlusion all subjects exhibited a reduction in eye velocity, which was followed in the majority by a recovery prior to target reappearance. In random presentations, eye velocity decayed and recovered to a level that followed on from the response to the initial ramp. In blocked presentations, there was evidence of improved scaling throughout, which culminated in a significant increase in eye velocity between the start and end of the transient occlusion (8 degrees/s2 only). These findings are difficult to reconcile with reflexive accounts of oculomotor control that perpetuate current eye motion, and hence generate a simple form of prediction using a direct efference copy ("eye-velocity memory"). Rather, they are more consistent with the scaling of smooth pursuit eye movements by means of a more-persistent velocity-based representation, which plays a significant role in both random and blocked stimulus presentations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0533-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

transient occlusion
12
subjects exhibited
12
smooth pursuit
12
eye velocity
12
smooth ocular
8
ocular pursuit
8
target motion
8
random blocked
8
exhibited anticipatory
8
anticipatory smooth
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!