We present an improved multileaf collimator (MLC) segmentation algorithm, denoted by SLS(NOTG) (static leaf sequencing with no tongue-and-groove error), for step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) delivery. SLS(NOTG) is an improvement over the MLC segmentation algorithm called SLS that was developed by Luan et al. [Med. Phys. 31(4), 695-707 (2004)], which did not consider tongue-and-groove error corrections. The aims of SLS(NOTG) are (1) shortening the treatment times of IMRT plans by minimizing their numbers of segments and (2) minimizing the tongue-and-groove errors of the computed IMRT plans. The input to SLS(NOTG) is intensity maps (IMs) produced by current planning systems, and its output is (modified) optimized leaf sequences without tongue-and-groove error. Like the previous SLS algorithm [Luan et al., Med. Phys. 31(4), 695-707 (2004)], SLS(NOTG) is also based on graph algorithmic techniques in computer science. It models the MLC segmentation problem as a weighted minimum-cost path problem, where the weight of the path is the number of segments and the cost of the path is the amount of tongue-and-groove error. Our comparisons of SLS(NOTG) with CORVUS indicated that for the same intensity maps, the numbers of segments computed by SLS(NOTG) are up to 50% less than those by CORVUS 5.0 on the Elekta LINAC system. Our clinical verifications have shown that the dose distributions of the SLS(NOTG) plans do not have tongue-and-groove error and match those of the corresponding CORVUS plans, thus confirming the correctness of SLS(NOTG). Comparing with existing segmentation methods, SLS(NOTG) also has two additional advantages: (1) SLS(NOTG) can compute leaf sequences whose tongue-and-groove error is minimized subject to a constraint on the maximum allowed number of segments, which may be desirable in clinical situations where a treatment with the complete correction of tongue-and-groove error takes too much time, and (2) SLS(NOTG) can be used to minimize a more general type of error called the tongue-or-groove error.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.2188823DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tongue-and-groove error
32
mlc segmentation
16
segmentation algorithm
12
slsnotg
12
error
10
tongue-and-groove
9
imrt delivery
8
phys 314
8
314 695-707
8
695-707 2004]
8

Similar Publications

Purpose: To quantify the impact of treatment planning system beam model parameters, based on the actual spread in radiotherapy community data, on clinical treatment plans and determine which complexity metrics best describe the impact beam modeling errors have on dose accuracy.

Methods: Ten beam modeling parameters for a Varian accelerator were modified in RayStation to match radiotherapy community data at the 2.5, 25, 50, 75, and 97.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: This work aims to provide a simulated method to be used by designers of medical accelerators and in clinical centers to manage and minimize particles' interaction in the patient-dependent part of a 6 MV X-Ray Beam generated by the Elekta linear accelerator system, based on the latest GATE software version 9.0 Monte Carlo simulation, IAEA phase space data, and the last version of "Slurm" computing cluster.

Materials And Methods: The experimental results are obtained using the Elekta 6 MV accelerator.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To develop a simplified aluminum compensator system for total body irradiation (TBI) that is easy to assemble and modify in a short period of time for customized patient treatments.

Methods: The compensator is composed of a combination of 0.3 cm thick aluminum bars, two aluminum T-tracks, spacers, and metal bolts.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: The purpose was to study comparative evaluation of calculated dose distribution by X-ray Voxel Monte Carlo (XVMC) for dose calculation in Acuros XB (AXB). The dose commissioning and head and neck volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) clinical cases were compared for AXB in Eclipse and XVMC in Monaco.

Methods: For TrueBeam at 6 MV, we compared the dose commissioning for simple rectangle, heterogeneity correction, and multileaf collimator (MLC) characteristics.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Modelling of the multi-leaf collimator (MLC) in treatment planning systems (TPS) is crucial for the dose calculation accuracy of intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans. However, no standardised methodology for their configuration exists to date. In this study we present a method that separates the effect of each dosimetric characteristic of the MLC, offering comprehensive equations for the determination of the configuration parameters used in the TPS model.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!