Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The accurate, reproducible, and timely reporting of nucleated red blood cells (NRBC) is an important function of the clinical hematology laboratory. We used 960 samples from 5 worldwide sites to evaluate a new NRBC enumeration method for the ADVIA 2120 Hematology System. The method showed excellent correlation with microscopy (r = 0.93). Sensitivity and specificity for the presence of NRBC for all samples analyzed was 77.3% and 74.6%, respectively. Almost all false negative samples were at NRBC counts
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1532/LH96.06010 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!