A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Retropharyngeal nodes in squamous cell carcinoma of oropharynx: incidence, localization, and implications for target volume. | LitMetric

Purpose: To investigate the incidence and anatomic localization of retropharyngeal (RP) nodal involvement in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx.

Methods And Materials: The CT studies of 208 patients presenting with oropharyngeal carcinoma were retrospectively analyzed. The location of the nodal neck disease was registered according to recent consensus guidelines for target volume delineation, and special attention was given to the RP nodes. To obtain statistically significant predictors for RP nodal involvement, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

Results: RP adenopathies were present in 16% of all patients and in 23% of those patients with nodal disease in other neck sites. Ipsilateral involvement of Level II and contralateral involvement of Level III predicted for involvement of the ipsilateral RP nodes on multivariate analysis (p < 0.05). A solitary ipsilateral RP node was present in 3 (9%) of 34 patients with RP nodes; 2 of these 3 patients had a primary posterior pharyngeal wall tumor. No patients presented with a solitary contralateral RP node.

Conclusion: Given the high incidence of RP nodal involvement in oropharyngeal cancer-16% of all patients and 23% of patients with pathologic nodal disease in other neck sites-RP nodes should be included in the target volume, especially in node-positive necks. In node-negative necks, inclusion of RP nodes into the target volume is advised in posterior pharyngeal wall tumors.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.02.034DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

target volume
16
nodal involvement
12
patients
9
squamous cell
8
cell carcinoma
8
patients 23%
8
23% patients
8
nodal disease
8
disease neck
8
involvement level
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!