A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Platelet function monitoring with the Sonoclot analyzer after in vitro tirofiban and heparin administration. | LitMetric

Objective: Reliable platelet function monitoring is desirable in patients treated with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors. The aim of the present laboratory-based study was to assess platelet function after administration of clinically relevant doses of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist tirofiban with or without heparin by using Sonoclot (Sienco Inc) and platelet aggregometry.

Methods: Tirofiban (0-100 ng x mL(-1)) and heparin (0 or 1 U x mL(-1)) were added to blood samples obtained from 20 healthy volunteers. Coagulation analysis was performed on citrated whole blood by using the Sonoclot analyzer. The glass bead-activated test and the new glass bead test with heparinase were used. The results were compared with adenosine-5'-diphosphate-activated platelet aggregometry.

Results: Administration of tirofiban showed a similar increase of platelet inhibition detected with the Sonoclot glass bead-activated test and glass bead test with heparinase, as well as by means of aggregometry. Bias between the different techniques was comparable; Spearman rank correlation was strong (glass bead-activated test vs aggregometry: rho = 0.823, P < .001; glass bead test with heparinase vs aggregometry: rho = 0.856, P < .001). After additional administration of heparin, platelet inhibition was only comparable for the glass bead test with heparinase and aggregometry, and the correlation coefficient remained unchanged for the glass bead test with heparinase versus aggregometry (rho = 0.878, P < .001). By contrast, the glass bead-activated test showed a nearly complete platelet inhibition with a significant bias compared with the glass bead test with heparinase and aggregometry. Correlation was weak for the glass bead-activated test versus aggregometry (rho = 0.407, P = .004).

Conclusions: When compared with platelet aggregometry, the glass bead-activated test from Sonoclot reliably detects glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibition with tirofiban in unheparinized whole blood. However, in heparinized blood the glass bead test with heparinase is essential to accurately assess platelet function.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.01.041DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

glass bead
28
bead test
28
test heparinase
28
glass bead-activated
24
bead-activated test
24
platelet function
16
aggregometry rho
16
glass
13
test
13
glycoprotein iib/iiia
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!