A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 197

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1057
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3175
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Aparasitemic serological suspects in Trypanosoma brucei gambiense human African trypanosomiasis: a potential human reservoir of parasites? | LitMetric

Aparasitemic serological suspects in Trypanosoma brucei gambiense human African trypanosomiasis: a potential human reservoir of parasites?

Acta Trop

Institut de Recherche Pour le Développement, Unité de Recherche 177, Programme Santé Animale, TA 207/G, Campus International de Baillarguet, 34398 Montpellier Cedex 5, France.

Published: May 2006

The serological and parasitological tests used for Trypanosoma brucei gambiense human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) diagnosis have low specificity and sensitivity, respectively, and in the field, control program teams are faced with subjects with positive serology but negative parasitology who remain untreated. The aim of this work was to explore, using PCR tool, the significance of these aparasitemic serological suspects. Since discordant PCR results have been observed earlier with different extraction methods, two DNA extraction methods were compared (the Chelex 100 resin and the DNeasy Tissue kit). The study was conducted on 604 blood samples: 574 from parasitologically confirmed patients, aparasitemic serological suspects and endemic controls collected in Côte d'Ivoire and 30 from healthy volunteers collected in France. No significant differences were observed between the PCR results obtained with the two extraction methods. Concerning PCR, problems of reproducibility and discordances with both serological and parasitological test results were observed, mainly for the aparasitemic serological suspects. In addition to previous results that pointed to the existence of non-virulent or non-pathogenic trypanosome strains and of individual susceptibility leading to long term seropositivity without detectable parasitaemia but positive PCR, the results of this study support the notion of a long lasting human reservoir that may contribute to the maintenance or periodic resurgences of HAT in endemic foci.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2006.04.001DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

aparasitemic serological
16
serological suspects
16
extraction methods
12
trypanosoma brucei
8
brucei gambiense
8
gambiense human
8
human african
8
african trypanosomiasis
8
human reservoir
8
serological parasitological
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!