A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Advantage of the right lateral position compared with the lithotomy position during the perineal procedure in abdominoperineal resection. | LitMetric

Background/aims: Abdominoperineal resection (APR) is generally performed in the lithotomy position (LT-APR). The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the advantage of the right lateral (RL) position during the perineal phase of APR, in extended APR (ext-APR) that needed additional excision of the pelvic organs and sacrococcyx, and in total pelvic exenteration (TPE).

Methods: The present study is based on 50 patients observed from January 1993 to December 2004 (43 with primary rectal malignancy, 7 with recurrent cancer), who had undergone the following surgeries: LT-APR was carried out in 20 patients, RL-APR in 13, LT-ext-APR in 5, RL-ext-APR in 8, LT-TPE in 2 and RL-TPE in 2. Perioperative factors were compared between the LT and RL position in each operative procedure.

Results: When RL-APR was compared with LT-APR, operative time (including the time to change the position) and the amount of operative blood loss were significantly less in RL-APR (mean +/- SE = 314 +/- 16 vs. 381 +/- 18 min, p = 0.0156 and 598 +/- 78 vs. 1,160 +/- 171 g, p = 0.0168, respectively). The blood loss and operative time were also significantly less in RL-ext-APR than in LT-ext-APR (1,060 +/- 170 vs. 3,590 +/- 1,270 g, p = 0.0277 and 353 +/- 31 vs. 488 +/- 41 min, p = 0.0219, respectively). The average blood loss and operative time were 4,190 g and 650 min in LT-TPE, and 1,450 g and 609 min in RL-TPE, respectively.

Conclusion: The RL position during the perineal phase following the abdominal phase in the LT position significantly decreases blood loss and operative time in APR and ext-APR.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000093492DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

operative time
16
blood loss
16
position perineal
12
loss operative
12
+/-
9
advantage lateral
8
position
8
lateral position
8
lithotomy position
8
abdominoperineal resection
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!