A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Validation of a non-mercury digital auscultatory device with manual pressure registration (PMS Mandaus). | LitMetric

Validation of a non-mercury digital auscultatory device with manual pressure registration (PMS Mandaus).

Blood Press Monit

Kings College London, Guy's, Kings and St Thomas' School of Medicine, Maternal and Fetal Health Research Unit, Division of Reproductive Health, Endocrinology and Development, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.

Published: June 2006

Objective: To assess the clinical accuracy of a non-mercury digital auscultatory device (PMS Mandaus) with manual pressure registration in an adult population.

Methods: The accuracy of the device was assessed by predefined criteria (European Society of Hypertension protocol) in 33 study participants recruited from among patients and staff in a teaching hospital. A series of same-arm sequential blood pressure measurements were taken: first, two observers taking simultaneous mercury readings, followed by a reading with the device. A total of seven readings were taken from each participant in the sitting position. The data were then analysed according to the European Society of Hypertension protocol and the criteria of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation.

Results: The device fulfilled the criteria of the European Society of Hypertension protocol, achieving a pass for both systolic and diastolic pressure. The device also passed the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation standard (the mean to be within 5+/-8 mmHg) with the mean differences being -3.2+/-3.8 mmHg for systolic blood pressure and -1.8+/-2.9 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure.

Conclusion: The device performed in a satisfactory manner according to the European Society of Hypertension and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation criteria. The systematic under-recording related to the delay of manual pressure registration is not sufficient to preclude clinical use.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.mbp.0000209076.15461.25DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

european society
16
society hypertension
16
manual pressure
12
pressure registration
12
hypertension protocol
12
association advancement
12
advancement medical
12
non-mercury digital
8
digital auscultatory
8
auscultatory device
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!