Background: Open discectomy is the standard surgical procedure in the treatment of patients with long-lasting sciatica caused by lumbar disc herniation. Minimally invasive approaches such as microendoscopic discectomy have gained attention in recent years. Reduced tissue trauma allows early ambulation, short hospital stay and quick resumption of daily activities. A comparative cost-effectiveness study has not been performed yet. We present the design of a randomised controlled trial on cost-effectiveness of microendoscopic discectomy versus conventional open discectomy in patients with lumbar disc herniation.

Methods/design: Patients (age 18-70 years) presenting with sciatica due to lumbar disc herniation lasting more than 6-8 weeks are included. Patients with disc herniation larger than 1/3 of the spinal canal diameter, or disc herniation less than 1/3 of the spinal canal diameter with concomitant lateral recess stenosis or sequestration, are eliglible for participation. Randomisation into microendoscopic discectomy or conventional unilateral transflaval discectomy will take place in the operating room after induction of anesthesia. The length of skin incision is equal in both groups. The primary outcome measure is the functional assessment of the patient, measured by the Roland Disability Questionnaire for Sciatica, at 8 weeks and 1 year after surgery. We will also evaluate several other outcome parameters, including perceived recovery, leg and back pain, incidence of re-operations, complications, serum creatine kinase, quality of life, medical consumption, absenteeism and costs. The study is a randomised prospective multi-institutional trial, in which two surgical techniques are compared in a parallel group design. Patients and research nurses are kept blinded of the allocated treatment during the follow-up period of 2 years.

Discussion: Currently, open discectomy is the golden standard in the surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation. Whether microendoscopic discectomy is more cost-effective than unilateral transflaval discectomy has to be determined by this trial.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1475863PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-7-42DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

disc herniation
24
microendoscopic discectomy
20
lumbar disc
20
open discectomy
16
discectomy
11
cost-effectiveness microendoscopic
8
discectomy versus
8
versus conventional
8
conventional open
8
treatment lumbar
8

Similar Publications

Introduction: Recurrent lumbar disc herniation (rLDH) remains a challenge in spinal surgery. This systematic review analyzes the use of transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (TFED) for the treatment of rLDH.

Methods: A comprehensive search of 4 electronic databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, Science Direct, and Cochrane, was conducted.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Lumbar disc herniation, canal stenosis and cervicarthrosis are degenerative spinal pathologies frequently observed in the aging population of patients with Parkinson Disease (PD). Spinal surgery in PD patients remains risky with uncertain functional results. The main issue is to determine whether a surgical procedure should be performed on PD patients with common degenerative spinal pathologies (CDSP).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD) stands as a primary pathophysiological driver of low back pain, yet no therapeutic intervention effectively arrests its progression. Evidence shows that certain Sirt1 agonists may confer protective effects on intervertebral discs, but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. This study aims to delineate the interaction between Sirt1 and the inflammatory microenvironment, offering potential novel avenues for IVDD prevention and treatment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: A sufficient foraminoplasty is critical in percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PETD) for lumbar disc herniation (LDH), which may affect the progress of surgery. This study assessed the repeated foraminoplasty applicated in PETD for LDH patients with lumbar foraminal stenosis (LFS).

Methods: 133 LDH patients with LFS who underwent PETD were enrolled in this study, which were segregated into the traditional foraminoplasty group (TF group) and the repeated foraminoplasty group (RF group).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!