After an overview of definitions of mental retardation and recent case law regarding mental retardation and the death penalty, this paper presents a study of factors associated with a mental retardation (MR) diagnosis among murder defendants. Subjects with a full-scale IQ< or =70 (n=42) were compared with other pretrial murder defendants (n=228) referred for forensic evaluation over a 5-year period. Subjects with an IQ< or =70 who were diagnosed with MR were compared with subjects with an IQ< or =70 who did not receive this diagnosis. Female murder defendants were more likely to receive a diagnosis of MR (p=0.03). MR was also more commonly diagnosed in subjects with an Axis I cognitive disorder (p=0.018). Having an IQ< or =70 was more common in subjects with a psychotic and substance use disorder (p=0.03) and did not necessarily lead to a diagnosis of MR in this subgroup. Implications for diagnosing MR among murder defendants are discussed.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00115.x | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Dog bites or knife wounds? A case report of atypical neck injuries.
Forensic Sci Med Pathol
November 2024
Institute of Legal medicine, CHRU TOURS, Trousseau Hospital, Avenue de la république, 37170, Chambray-lès-Tours, France.
Article Synopsis
- A 24-year-old woman suffered fatal injuries from a dog attack, resulting in 21 deep neck wounds and damage to vital structures such as carotid arteries and the larynx.
- Initial forensic findings suggested homicide due to the nature of the injuries, leading to the arrest of a witness.
- A second expert review concluded that the injuries were consistent with dog bites rather than homicide, attributing the cause of death to cerebral anoxia from vascular damage and asphyxia related to the injuries.
When a Battered Victim Kills Their Abuser: The Impact of Child and Expert Testimony on Mock Jurors' Decision-Making.
J Interpers Violence
October 2024
John Jay College of Criminal Justice, CUNY (City University of New York), New York, USA.
Article Synopsis
- - The study examined how child and expert witness testimonies influence mock jurors' views on a self-defense case involving a woman who killed her husband during a fight, using a 3x3 design with different expert witness types and child witness ages.
- - Mock jurors who heard expert testimony on Battered Woman Syndrome (BWS) perceived the defendant as more guilty, especially when an 8-year-old child testified, leading to harsher sentencing compared to cases with a younger child or no child witness.
- - Despite jurors viewing the defendant as more fearful in the BWS condition, this did not affect their sentencing decisions, highlighting the complex dynamics of expert testimony and child witnesses in domestic violence cases.
Survey of change-of-venue motions in appellate court transcripts of murder trials (2000-2020): Which factors make a difference?
Behav Sci Law
October 2024
Department of Psychological Sciences, University of San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
A court may move the location of the trial to another jurisdiction if the jury pool is deemed biased by the judge, a legal maneuver based on a "Change of Venue" motion (CoVm). We surveyed the frequency and the factors associated with granting the motion at the state level when the defendant was charged with murder. We reviewed court transcripts of appealed murder convictions during the 2000-2020 years from Nexis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe Judicial Interpretation of Intimate Partner Homicide in China: An Empirical Analysis of Sentencing Practice Between 2016 and 2021.
Violence Against Women
September 2024
Department of Law, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
In recent years, China has endeavored to implement individualized sentencing for cases of intimate partner homicide (IPH), using both legal and extralegal factors, to protect potential female victims and female defendants. This study examines the factors influencing the sentencing of IPH, utilizing a sample comprising 921 cases from 2016 to 2021 on the China Judgments Online website. The results show that: (1) the legal factor "victim's fault" is the main reason for the leniency of sentencing for female defendants compared to male defendants; and (2) intimate partner relationships between defendants and victims can have a protective effect on sentencing.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!