Peritoneal catheter removal may be clinically indicated in the management of peritonitis. The data on the course of patients undergoing peritoneal catheter reinsertion after removal for peritonitis are limited. The present study was designed to examine what happens to patients on chronic peritoneal dialysis (CPD) after peritoneal catheter removal for peritonitis. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients who developed peritonitis between January 1, 1990, and September 1, 2002. We identified 1146 episodes of peritonitis; in 189 of the episodes (16%), the peritoneal catheter was removed. Catheters were reinserted in 88 of those patients (47%). Reasons for peritoneal catheter removal among the 88 patients who underwent peritoneal catheter reinsertion included unit protocol (51%), poor response to antibiotics (46%), and exit-site or tunnel infection (3%). Reasons for peritoneal catheter removal among the 101 patients in whom the peritoneal catheter was not reinserted included unit protocol (62%), poor response to antibiotics (20%), and extensive history of peritonitis (18%). After reinsertion, the new peritoneal catheter remained in place for a mean of 15.4 +/- 15.4 months (range: 1-75 months). In 37 of the 88 patients with reinserted peritoneal catheters (42%), the catheters remained in place for longer than 1 year. The remaining 6 patients underwent transplantation or were transferred to another facility. Of the remaining 51 patients whose new peritoneal catheters lastedfor less than I year, 13 (25.5%) died, and 32 (63%) were transferred permanently to hemodialysis. Of the 101 patients who did not have a peritoneal catheter reinserted, 23 (23%) died within the 2-week period following the onset of peritonitis. The rest were transferred to hemodialysis. The reasons noted for not reinserting the peritoneal catheter included frequent episodes of peritonitis, patient unwillingness to retry CPD therapy, psychosocial reasons, bowel perforation, or transfer to an institution unable to perform CPD therapy. We conclude that, among patients who medically require peritoneal catheter removal because of peritonitis, few will successfully return to long-term CPD therapy. Of the patients who required peritoneal catheter removal in our study, 23% died within the first 2 weeks after the onset of peritonitis, before catheter reinsertion could be considered. Only 47% of the patients underwent a successful catheter reinsertion; and, of those, only 34% remained on CPD therapy I year later Thus, only 20% of patients undergoing PD catheter removal remain on CPD therapy 1 year after catheter removal.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

peritoneal catheter
56
catheter removal
36
cpd therapy
20
peritoneal
18
catheter
18
removal peritonitis
16
catheter reinsertion
16
patients
14
patients underwent
12
patients peritoneal
12

Similar Publications

Expansion of home hemodialysis (HHD) provides an opportunity to improve clinical outcomes, reduce cost of care, and address the staffing challenges currently faced in caring for patients with kidney failure on replacement therapy. To increase HHD expansion, current practices and barriers to home dialysis must be examined and addressed. One such barrier is vascular access for HHD; although tunneled hemodialysis central venous catheters (CVCs) have been used for decades, physicians still hesitate to send patients home without a mature, functional arteriovenous access.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Medically intractable ascites causes substantial distress in patients with palliative disease. Tunneled peritoneal catheters have been established as a feasible treatment option allowing patient-controlled paracentesis in a homecare setting. However, while a range of complications is associated with these drainages, risk factors for complications have not been identified so far.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The beneficial impact of peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter placement following cardiopulmonary bypass in young infants has been demonstrated. But the indications to start early peritoneal dialysis are not agreed upon.

Methods: This retrospective single center study was conducted to evaluate the performance of a clinical strategy for early PD start.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Examining the progress and implementation of neonatal peritoneal dialysis in the Ningxia autonomous region.

BMC Pediatr

January 2025

Department of Neonatology, PKUFH-NINGXIA Women & Children's Hospital, No.127 Lakeside Road, Jinfeng District, Yinchuan, Ningxia, 750001, China.

Background: Neonates are prone to experiencing acute kidney injury (AKI) and metabolic irregularities. Although hemodialysis is a primary treatment for these conditions, its utilization is not prevalent in the Ningxia Autonomous Region in China. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) presents itself as an alternative with benefits such as simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and minimal technical complexity compared to hemodialysis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The occurrence of anterior abdominal wall ulcer at the site of the peritoneal catheter (PC) is one of the rarest complications of peritoneal dialysis (PD). When present, it is mainly caused by which respond well to vancomycin therapy. Despite well-conducted therapy, there is a tendency to relapse and induce peritonitis, which makes it necessary to remove the PC and change the dialysis model of treatment and/or re-insert the catheter at another place to preserve PD as a treatment method.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!