We examined appropriate sequence, schedule, and doses of gemcitabine (G) and paclitaxel (T) in patients with persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. Patients received a maximum of six cycles of gemcitabine on days 1 and 8 (starting 1000 mg/m(2)), and paclitaxel (starting 135 mg/m(2)) on day 8 (groups A and B) or day 1 (group C). Drug sequences (G-->T and T-->G) were tested in group A. In group A, changing sequences of gemcitabine and paclitaxel infusion were evaluated. Sequence G-->T raised grade 3 alanine transaminase in two of three patients leading to use of T-->G sequence for remainder of study. In group B, maximum tolerable dose was reached at gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) and paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2). Reducing paclitaxel to 150 mg/m(2) allowed escalation of gemcitabine to 1250 mg/m(2), but neutropenia-related treatment delays occurred. Giving paclitaxel on day 1 (group C) enabled administration of paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) and gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) with minimal dose adjustments. The overall response rate was 41.0%, with 2 complete responses and 14 partial responses in 39 eligible patients. The schedule of paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) (day 1) and gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 8), with sequence of T-->G, appears most suitable with tolerable toxicity and promising activity.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00466.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

gemcitabine paclitaxel
12
paclitaxel 175
12
175 mg/m2
12
gemcitabine 1250
12
1250 mg/m2
12
mg/m2
10
paclitaxel
9
gemcitabine
8
ovarian cancer
8
1000 mg/m2
8

Similar Publications

Background: In recent years, the incidence of pancreatic cancer has shown an obvious increasing trend worldwide and even causes a greater disease burden to the mankind. Due to the lack of effective early surveillance methods, patients are often in the middle to advanced stages of their disease at the time of detection, thus losing the opportunity for surgery. The currently available chemotherapy regimens are yet to be further improved to prolong patient survival.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To assess the association between neoadjuvant therapy and overall survival (OS) in patients with left-sided resectable pancreatic cancer (RPC) compared to upfront surgery.

Background: Left-sided pancreatic cancer is associated with worse OS compared to right-sided pancreatic cancer. Although neoadjuvant therapy is currently seen as not effective in patients with RPC, current randomized trials included mostly patients with right-sided RPC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Benefits of neoadjuvant treatment for pancreatic cancer with major vessel invasion has been demonstrated through randomized controlled trials; however, the optimal neoadjuvant treatment strategy remains controversial, especially for radiotherapy. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy and the optimal time interval to undergo surgery after radiotherapy in (borderline) resectable pancreatic cancer.

Methods: Between 2013 and 2022, patients with (borderline) resectable pancreatic cancer with vessel contact who received 5-fluorouracil with leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan or gemcitabine and nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel as initial treatment following surgery were included.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We seek to establish a parsimonious mathematical framework for understanding the interaction and dynamics of the response of pancreatic cancer to the NGC triple chemotherapy regimen (mNab-paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and cisplatin), stromal-targeting drugs (calcipotriol and losartan), and an immune checkpoint inhibitor (anti-PD-L1). We developed a set of ordinary differential equations describing changes in tumor size (growth and regression) under the influence of five cocktails of treatments. Model calibration relies on three tumor volume measurements obtained over a 14-day period in a genetically engineered pancreatic cancer model (KrasLSLG12D-Trp53LSLR172H-Pdx1-Cre).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Inhibitory effects of the combination of rapamycin with gemcitabine plus paclitaxel on the growth of pancreatic cancer tumors.

Hum Cell

January 2025

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Kohasu, Oko-cho, Nankoku, Kochi, 783-8505, Japan.

We previously examined the antitumor effects of short interfering RNA nanoparticles targeting mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) in an orthotopic pancreatic cancer mouse model. We herein report the inhibitory effects of the mTOR inhibitor rapamycin on tumor growth in a novel established mouse model of pancreatic cancer using human pancreatic cancer cell line-derived organoids. Gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil, and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel are clinically used to treat advanced pancreatic cancer.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!