A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Blood pressure control in haemodialysis patients: an audit. | LitMetric

Objective: This audit was conducted to study the level of achievement of some criteria relevant to blood pressure control in haemodialysis patients and to evaluate if auditing process improves the quality of medical care given to these patients.

Methods: The records of all 105 patients on maintenance haemodialysis were included in the study. Five criteria relevant to blood pressure control were selected for auditing. The criteria were: predialysis blood pressure control <140/80, dry weight, dialysis adequacy, salt and water intake restriction, and patient education. The auditing process was conducted at two different times 6 months apart.

Results: The first data collected in the auditing process showed that there were only 40 patients (38%) with controlled predialysis blood pressure. In the second data collection the number of patients with controlled predialysis blood pressure had risen significantly to 78 (74.3%), P < 0.0001. The same improvement was achieved for dry weight 39 (37%) to 73 (69.5%) P < 0.0001, dialysis adequacy 38 (36.2%) to 75 (71.4%) P = 0.043, salt and water intake restriction 39 (37%) to 71 (67.6%) P = 0.045, and patient education 30 (28.6%) to 55 (52.4%) P < 0.0001.

Conclusion: Setting up audit cycles to evaluate achievement of required standard in relevant criteria contribute to better blood pressure control and leads to improvement in the care of patients on dialysis. Auditing can be an essential tool in identification of poorly controlled blood pressure, its cause and is useful in control of hypertension in the haemodialysis population.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1797.2006.00549.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

blood pressure
16
pressure control
16
control haemodialysis
8
haemodialysis patients
8
criteria relevant
8
relevant blood
8
blood
4
control
4
patients audit
4
audit objective
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!