Background: Medicare data may be a useful source for determining the utilization of mammography among elderly women, but the accuracy of these data has not been established.
Objective: We determined whether Medicare physician billing claims are an accurate reflection of mammography utilization among women ages 65 and older and whether they can be used to assess the use of screening as compared with diagnostic mammography.
Data Sources: Mammography use was assessed using Medicare billing claims and radiology reports from 2 mammography registries; the San Francisco Mammography Registry and the New Mexico Mammography Registry.
Methods: Completeness of the Medicare data was assessed by comparing mammography use based on Medicare, with radiology reports from the mammography registries, which served as the referent standard. Capture rates for Medicare claims for individual mammograms were examined, and women were characterized as having undergone at least 1 mammogram within each 2-year period based on the Medicare data, and these rates were compared with the referent standard. To determine whether Medicare data can distinguish between screening and diagnostic mammography, we performed a classification analysis using the mammography registries screening/diagnostic designation as the referent standard (dependent variable) and Medicare claim information as the independent/predictor variable. On the basis of the mammogram level classification analysis, women were categorized as having been frequently screened (at least 2 screening mammograms spaced by 12 to 36 months), screened (at least 1 screening mammogram), or not screened.
Subjects: Women ages 65 and older, diagnosed with breast cancer between 1992-1999, who had at least 1 mammogram between 1992-1999 were examined.
Results: A total of 3340 mammograms were obtained in 1371 women between 1992 and 1999. Overall, 83% of mammograms obtained by these women had a corresponding billing claim in Medicare. This increased from 65% in 1992 to 90% in 1999. Of women who underwent at least 1 mammogram during each 2-year period per the referent standard, 94% of women were accurately classified by Medicare claims as also having undergone mammography during the same 2-year period. In multivariable analysis, a mammogram was more likely to be associated with a billing claim over time, for women 80 years or older, and for white and Asian as compared with Hispanic women. Neither socioeconomic status nor screening/diagnostic designation affected the likelihood that a mammogram would be associated with a billing claim. The Medicare data accurately categorized a given mammogram as screening or diagnostic for 87.5% of mammograms. Lastly, there was moderate to substantial agreement in the categorization of women as frequently screened, screened or not screened between the 2 data sets (weighted kappa 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.70-0.78).
Conclusion: Medicare administrative claims are reliable for assessment of mammography utilization and have become more accurate over time. Medicare claims data also provide a mechanism for designating mammography as screening or diagnostic, which subsequently may allow accurate description of a woman's screening history.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000207436.07513.79 | DOI Listing |
JAMA Health Forum
January 2025
Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Importance: Although Medicare Advantage plans frequently offer dental benefits, enrollees report lower rates of dental care use and higher rates of unmet dental need compared with individuals with employer-sponsored benefits. It is unknown which attributes of Medicare Advantage dental plans are associated with enhanced dental care access.
Objective: To determine attributes of Medicare Advantage dental plans associated with higher rates of dental care use and lower rates of unmet dental need.
JAMA Netw Open
January 2025
RAND Health, RAND, Boston, Massachusetts.
Importance: Long-term nursing home stay or death (long-term NH stay or death), defined as new long-term residence in a nursing home or death following hospital discharge, is an important patient-centered outcome.
Objective: To examine whether the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with changes in long-term NH stay or death among older adults with sepsis, and whether these changes were greater in individuals from racial and ethnic minoritized groups.
Design, Setting, And Participants: This cross-sectional study used patient-level data from the Medicare Provider Analysis and Review File, the Master Beneficiary Summary File, and the Minimum Data Set.
J Rural Health
January 2025
North Carolina Rural Health Research Program, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Purpose: To provide a new approach for defining rural hospital markets.
Methods: First, we estimated models of hospital choice. We defined hospitals in the choice set using nationwide hospital data from the Healthcare Cost Report Information System (HCRIS).
Med Care Res Rev
January 2025
Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.
Post-acute care users in Medicare Advantage (MA) plans may seek coverage changes if facing issues with plan benefits. In 2019, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services extended the deadline to disenroll from an MA plan from February 14 to March 31 and, for the first time, permitted beneficiaries to switch to a different MA plan instead of traditional Medicare. Using 2016-2019 Medicare administrative data, we implemented a difference-in-differences approach to evaluate the impact of this policy on disenrollment from a plan within 1 month of initiating skilled nursing facility or home health services.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Health Serv Res
January 2025
Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Background: The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009 introduced the Meaningful Use program to incentivize the adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) in the U.S. This study investigates the disparities in EHR adoption and interoperability between rural and urban physicians in the context of federal programs like the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 and the 21st Century Cures Act.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!