The article summarizes published data regarding the prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in surgery, in laparoscopic surgery, in venous surgery and in urology. In surgical patients with low risk, no specific thromboprophylaxis is needed. Patients with moderate risk levels are the candidates for administration of subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) at doses under 3 400 anti-Xa units a day and patients with increased risk at doses higher than 3 400 anti-Xa units a day during the period of higher risk. In order to decrease the risk of bleeding, a half dose 2 hours prior or 4-6 hours after the operation can be administered. Under the highest risk conditions, there is a recommendation to combine LMWH over 3 400 anti-Xa units with elastic panty-hose or, alternatively, with intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC). At moderate risk levels, subcutaneous administration of unfractionated heparin at the doses of 5 000 units twice a day is also possible and at increased risk levels, a TID administration (LDUH) over the increased risk period. In patients with a significant bleeding risk, the physical method of thromboprophylaxis can be used and pharmacological prophylaxis can set in after the risk of bleeding has passed. Fondaparinux is the alternative to LMWH in people with a history of heparin induced thrombocytopenia over the past three months. The sole use of acetylsalycilic acid is not recommended. While undertaking epidural anaesthesia or analgesia, it is necessary to follow strictly the guidelines of the use of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. Thromboprophylaxis with LMWH, LDUH, elastic panty-hose or IPC is indicated only in those patients who undergo laparoscopic surgeries and who moreover display the additional thrombosis factors. Patients with additional risk thrombosis factors undergoing major venous reconstructions require prophylaxis with LMWH (or LDUH). Uncomplicated patients undergoing transurethral or other low risk urologic surgery require no specific thromboprophylaxis. If they undergo a major intervention and/or they display additional risk thrombosis factors, they require the administration of LMWH or LDUH. Elastic panty-hose and/or intermittent pneumatic compression have the same indication as in abdominal surgeries.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

risk
14
risk levels
12
400 anti-xa
12
anti-xa units
12
units day
12
increased risk
12
elastic panty-hose
12
lmwh lduh
12
thrombosis factors
12
venous thromboembolism
8

Similar Publications

Introduction: Body mass index (BMI) has been implicated in various cardiovascular conditions, but its association with peripheral artery disease (PAD) in both real-world and genetic studies have been contentious and debated.

Methods: This study enrolled 6707 individuals from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey database to investigate the association between BMI and the risk of PAD. The weighted logistic regression, restricted cubic spline, and subgroup analysis were performed using real-world data.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Unplanned, delayed readmissions (>30 ds) following oncologic surgeries can increase mortality and care costs and affect hospital quality indices. However, there is a dearth of literature on rectal cancer surgery. Hence, we aimed to assess the risk factors associated with delayed readmissions following rectal cancer surgery to improve targeted interventions, patient outcomes, and quality indices.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb) infection can lead to various outcomes, including active tuberculosis or latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). Household contacts of TB cases have a high risk of acquiring LTBI.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Importance: Endocrine treatments, such as Tamoxifen (TAM) and/or Aromatase inhibitors (AI), are the adjuvant therapy of choice for hormone-receptor positive breast cancer. These agents are associated with menopausal symptoms, adversely affecting drug compliance. Topical estrogen (TE) has been proposed for symptom management, given its' local application and presumed reduced bioavailability, however its oncological safety remains uncertain.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Excisional hemorrhoidectomy and stapled hemorrhoidopexy are 2 common procedures for treating symptomatic hemorrhoids. However, concerns persist regarding the risk of postoperative complications and their unclear prevalence in the literature. This systematic review aims to evaluate and compare the prevalence of incontinence after stapled hemorrhoidopexy and excisional hemorrhoidectomy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!