Background: Hospitalized patients with a wide range of serious, but not necessarily terminal illnesses are now receiving palliative care consultations. The purpose of this report is to describe what palliative care patients say is "most important to achieve" at the time of initial consultation.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective descriptive content analysis of patient responses to the question "What is most important for you to achieve?" recorded at the time of initial inpatient palliative care consultation. Two hundred fifteen patient records had documented first-person patient responses recorded. These responses were independently reviewed and categorized in a four-phase iterative process.
Results: Responses were divided into four major categories: (1) Improving quality and meaning ("I want to be able to sit on my front porch and watch the farm go by.") (52%); (2) Achieving relief or comfort ("Can you get rid of my pain?") (34%); (3) Altering the trajectory of illness ("If there is a treatment that can make me well, I want it.") (22%); and (4) Preparing for dying ("I am not afraid of dying. I just don't want to suffer.") (11%). Five percent of responses were unable to be reliably categorized ("You ask hard questions."). Some respondents gave more than one response, so the total is greater than 100%.
Conclusions: Patients receiving palliative care consultation give a wide range of responses to the question "What is most important for you to achieve?" Such patient-centered inquiry about priorities deserves more systematic study in the future if patient-specific goals are to be a marker of high-quality palliative care.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2006.9.382 | DOI Listing |
BMC Palliat Care
January 2025
Department of Nursing, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, No. 599 Dayang East Road, Linhai, Zhejiang, 317000, China.
Background: Delirium frequently occurs in palliative care settings, yet its screening, identification, and management remain suboptimal in clinical practice. This review aims to elucidate the barriers preventing healthcare professionals from effectively screening, recognizing, and managing delirium in adult patients receiving specialist palliative care, with the goal of developing strategies to enhance clinical practice.
Methods: A mixed-methods systematic review was conducted (PROSPERO: CRD42024563666).
BMC Palliat Care
January 2025
Palliative Care Unit, National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Objective: To compare the sociodemographic and clinical profiles of patients with advanced cancer admitted to a tertiary palliative care unit before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods: This is an analysis of data from patients receiving care before (10/21/2019 to 03/16/2020) and during (09/23/2020 to 08/26/2021) the COVID-19 pandemic. Sociodemographic and clinical data were evaluated.
BMC Palliat Care
January 2025
Institute on Aging and Lifelong Health, University of Victoria, 3800 Finnerty Road, Victoria, BC, V8P 5C2, Canada.
Background: While an extensive body of research in palliative care exists on the experiences of grief and bereavement among family caregivers, much of this research is based on normative assumptions of who family caregivers are - housed, financially stable, and with extended family and/or friends to draw on for support. Research shows that in contexts of social disadvantage(e.g.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Palliat Care
January 2025
DEFACTUM, Central Region Denmark, Aarhus, Denmark.
Background: Despite growing research on the daily life of people with advanced cancer, more specific knowledge is needed about the specific strategies these people use to manage everyday activities.
Purpose: This study explores how people with advanced cancer manage their everyday activities and describe their specific strategies.
Methods: The qualitative study was designed with an explorative approach.
BMC Cancer
January 2025
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Background: People with malignancy of undefined primary origin (MUO) have a poor prognosis and may undergo a protracted diagnostic workup causing patient distress and high cancer related costs. Not having a primary diagnosis limits timely site-specific treatment and access to precision medicine. There is a need to improve the diagnostic process, and healthcare delivery and support for these patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!