A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Immunohistochemical and genetic analysis of osteoclastic giant cell tumor of the pancreas. | LitMetric

Clinical, histopathologic, immunohistochemical, and genetic analyses of 2 osteoclastic giant cell tumors of the pancreas are presented. The neoplasms were composed of osteoclastic giant cells and pleomorphic cells (PCs). The tissue-specific markers gave evidence of mesenchymal nature of the osteoclastic giant cells, as well as other components of the tumor, and lacked any signs of epithelial differentiation in both patients. The nonepithelial nature of both components in the osteoclastic giant cell tumors presented may be associated with a better prognosis, which corresponds to the previous reports of similar neoplasms. A positive immunoreactivity to neuron-specific enolase was recorded in patient 2. The presence of CD68 in osteoclastic giant cells proved their histiocytic nature. Both components of the tumors showed a negative immunoreactivity to desmin and only a scattered reactivity to smooth muscle cell actin, typical markers of myofibroblastic differentiation. Mutation analysis of the tumor revealed the wild state of both p53 and K-ras oncogenes in both patients. A positive immunoreactivity for p53 in PCs of both osteoclastic giant cell tumors was recorded, whereas osteoclastic giant cells did not express this protein. The expression of p21 was recorded in osteoclastic giant cells in patient 1. The absence of Ki-67 in the osteoclastic giant cells and its expression in PCs gave evidence of a different proliferation rate of both cell populations. Different tissue-specific markers, a different proliferation rate, and a different state of oncogene activation in the osteoclastic giant cell tumors contribute to the idea that the tumor derives from a pluripotent cell that may differentiate into an array of phenotypes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.mpa.0000202951.10612.faDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

osteoclastic giant
44
giant cells
24
giant cell
20
cell tumors
16
osteoclastic
11
giant
11
immunohistochemical genetic
8
cell
8
tissue-specific markers
8
nature components
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!