Objective: To examine the increasing use of UV tanning parlors by adolescents, despite the World Health Organization recommendation that no one under the age of 18 years use UV tanning devices.

Design: We examined tanning advertisements in a sample of public high school newspapers published between 2001 and 2005 in 3 Colorado counties encompassing the Denver metropolitan area.

Results: Tanning advertisements appeared in newspapers from 11 (48%) of 23 schools. Newspaper issues (N = 131) contained 40 advertisements placed by 18 tanning parlors. Advertisements commonly offered discounts (19 of 40) including unlimited tanning offers (15 of 40). Thirteen advertisements featured non-UV tanning treatments, and 2 advertisements mentioned parental consent or accompaniment for UV tanning.

Conclusions: UV radiation, a classified carcinogen, is commonly and specifically marketed to adolescents through high school newspaper advertising. Public health skin cancer prevention policies should include the prohibition of UV tanning advertising to minors.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archderm.142.4.460DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tanning advertisements
12
high school
12
tanning
9
school newspapers
8
tanning parlors
8
advertisements
6
advertisements high
4
newspapers objective
4
objective examine
4
examine increasing
4

Similar Publications

The Cost-Effectiveness of Primary Prevention Interventions for Skin Cancer: An Updated Systematic Review.

Appl Health Econ Health Policy

September 2024

Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Locked Bag 2000, Brisbane, QLD, 4029, Australia.

Objective: Preventing the onset of skin malignancies is feasible by reducing exposure to ultraviolet radiation. We reviewed published economic evaluations of primary prevention initiatives in the past decade, to support investment decisions for skin cancer prevention.

Methods: We assessed cost-effectiveness, cost-utility and benefit-cost analyses published from 1 September 2013.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Artificial ultraviolet radiation from tanning beds has been classified as carcinogenic by the International Agency for Research on Cancer in 2009. Several countries have subsequently introduced comprehensive legislation regulating commercial indoor tanning. Specific aspects of these regulations address tanning bed advertising and information requirements for tanning bed customers, which have been previously neglected in international comparisons of indoor tanning regulations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Indoor tanning beds lead to over 450,000 new skin cancer cases each year, with a 10.4% global prevalence among users, prompting the need for effective public health messaging on platforms like Instagram.* -
  • A public health campaign on Instagram targeted young women and men at high risk for indoor tanning, featuring 34 ads and reaching over 1 million individuals, with significant engagement on the health information landing page.* -
  • Despite high ad exposure and website visits, the campaign did not result in measurable changes in foot traffic to tanning salons, indicating a need for further research to assess effectiveness.*
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

An Epidemiological Update on Indoor Tanning and the Risk of Skin Cancers.

Curr Oncol

November 2022

Melanoma and Skin Cancer Unit, 1st Department of Dermatology-Venereology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Andreas Sygros Hospital, 16121 Athens, Greece.

Indoor tanning (sunbeds, solarium) uses artificial ultraviolet radiation (UVR) to stimulate cosmetic tanning of the skin. Indoor tanning has been officially classified as a human carcinogen in 2009 by the International Agency for Research on Cancer of the World Health Organization (WHO). The differences in the prevalence of sunbed use across countries and over the years highlight underlying legislative, climatic, and cultural differences.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Indoor tanning continues to remain common, despite evidence of an increased risk of skin cancer from artificial ultraviolet (UV) radiation. In the hopes of gaining customers, the tanning bed industry has marketed health benefits of indoor tanning such as increased vitamin D production, development of a base tan, enhanced mood, and treatment of certain dermatologic conditions. To better educate their patients, providers need a comprehensive reference reviewing the evidence that support or oppose these claims.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!