The purpose of the present study was to investigate retrospectively which aortic clamping technique, the single clamp technique (SCT) or double clamping technique (DCT), is safer in terms of cerebral functions in patients who have undergone coronary bypass surgery. We evaluated 1100 patients who underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery at our institute from 1998 to 2004. The two groups, SCT (n = 550, 50%) and DCT (n = 550, 50%), were comparable with respect to smoking, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peripheral arterial disease, history of neurological events, creatinine levels, and existence of a carotid lesion. No significant differences between the SCT and DCT groups were observed in terms of cardiac and cerebral complications perioperatively and postoperatively. Both single and double clamping techniques have advantages and disadvantages in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1536/ihj.47.185DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

coronary bypass
12
single double
8
aortic clamping
8
safer terms
8
terms cerebral
8
clamping technique
8
double clamping
8
bypass surgery
8
550 50%
8
double aortic
4

Similar Publications

Background: Areas of conduction disorders play an important role in both initiation and perpetuation of AF and can be recognized by specific changes in unipolar potential morphology. For example, EGM fractionation may be caused by asynchronous activation of adjacent cardiomyocytes because of structural barriers such as fibrotic strands. However, it is unknown whether there are sex differences in unipolar potential morphology.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Association between white blood cell count and coronary artery bypass graft failure: an individual patient data analysis of clinical trials.

J Cardiothorac Surg

January 2025

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 E 68th St, New York, NY, 10065, USA.

Background: Baseline systemic inflammation is associated with worse long-term outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG], but the mechanisms of this association are unclear. This study aims to explore the association between pre-operative white blood cell [WBC] count and CABG graft failure.

Methods: We pooled individual patient data from two randomized clinical trials with systematic CABG graft imaging.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Beating-heart CABG in patients with LV dysfunction can provide the best of all words by limiting myocardial injury purported by cardioplegic arrest. Complete revascularization is possible and graft numbers are not different when compared to arrested heart CABG. Furthermore, beating-heart CABG more often reduces the need for intraoperative and postoperative mechanical support reducing the complications and costs associated with these devices.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Association Between Cardiothoracic Fellows and Clinical and Financial Outcomes in Coronary Surgery.

J Surg Res

January 2025

Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina.

Introduction: Mounting financial pressures on academic institutions highlight the need to understand the effect on outcomes from trainee involvement in cardiac surgery. The purpose of this study is to examine the association between cardiothoracic fellows and clinical and financial outcomes in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

Methods: Data for all patients from 2017 to 2022 at a single institution who underwent nonemergent, isolated, open CABG were included in the study, with patients grouped by whether there was fellow operative participation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery (OPCAB) has been suggested as superior to on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery (ONCAB) in certain high-risk subgroups, but its benefit in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate OPCAB versus ONCAB outcomes in COPD patients.

Methods: We followed PRISMA guidelines and searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library in August 2024 for studies comparing OPCAB and ONCAB in COPD patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!