A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The limited protocol MRI in diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation. | LitMetric

The limited protocol MRI in diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation.

J Med Assoc Thai

Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand.

Published: February 2006

Objective: To assess agreement in detection of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) between limited and full protocol MRI.

Material And Method: 123 patients who requested lumbar MRI for diagnosis of disc herniation were assessed The full protocol MRI composed of sagittal T1-wi, sagittal T2-wi and axial T2-wi was performed on each patient. The sagittal T2-wi was selected as the limited protocol MRI. The limited and full protocols MRI of each patient were separately interpreted by three neuroradiologists to assess disc herniation and nerve root compression. The consensus results of limited and full protocol were compared. The diagnostic performance of each protocol was analyzed using surgery as the gold standard.

Results: There were 62 females and 61 males enrolled into the study between the age of 21-60 years old (means = 42.91 years). The duration of pain was 1-204 months (mean = 31.20 months). The degree of severity was mild in 23.58%, moderate 45.52% and severe 30.89% of cases. Thirty-three cases were operated on. For detection of LDH, the limited protocol gave the same interpretation results as the full protocol (0 = 1.04, 95%CI = 0.94, 1.14 with accepted range of 0.95-1.05). In nerve root compression, the limited protocol was not accurate as the full protocol (0 = 0.75, 95%CI = 0.87, 0.63). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, NPV, and LR+ in the surgical group of limited protocol in diagnosis of LDH were 82.61%, 80%, 81.82%, 90.48%, 60.67%, 4.13 and in nerve root compression were 54.84%, 100%, 57.58%, 100%, 12.5% respectively. The same statistics of full protocol MRI in diagnosis of LDH were 82.61%, 70.80%, 78.79%, 86.36%, 63.64%, 2.75 and of nerve root compression were 80.65%, 100%, 81.82%, 100%, 25% respectively. The sensitivity and specificity in diagnosis of LDH were not different in both protocols but the sensitivity of nerve root compression was statistically significant different (p < 0.013, 95%CI = -0.33, -0.25).

Conclusion: The authors concluded that limited protocol MRI may replace full protocol MRI in diagnosis of LDH but not in nerve root compression.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

full protocol
28
limited protocol
24
protocol mri
24
nerve root
24
root compression
24
mri diagnosis
16
disc herniation
16
diagnosis ldh
16
protocol
13
limited full
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!