Objectives: We examined the effects of differing financial risk arrangements for mental health, physical health, and pharmacy services on the overall costs of these services with particular attention to cost containment and cost shifting.

Methods: Comprehensive service utilization information was obtained from a sample of 458 adults with severe mental illnesses during a 12-month period. Rate information was used to calculate costs for health, mental health and pharmacy. A 2-part model was employed to test for differences among financial risk conditions.

Results: Total treatment costs, both those financed by Medicaid and those paid by other sources, were lower in plans that had a broader array of services for which they were at risk. Pharmacy costs were principally responsible for these differences.

Conclusions: Treatment costs for adults with severe mental illnesses can be contained by placing providers at financial risk. However, risk arrangements may also increase treatment costs borne by other payers including charity services and self-pay. Evaluating the impact of at-risk financing mechanisms from a public health perspective requires assessing cost shifting, particularly for pharmaceuticals.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000204302.26073.13DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

financial risk
16
treatment costs
16
risk arrangements
8
mental health
8
health pharmacy
8
adults severe
8
severe mental
8
mental illnesses
8
costs
7
risk
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!