AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to assess how the extent of mesorectal tumor invasion affects prognosis in patients with T3 rectal cancer.
  • Data from two groups of patients (196 and 247) who had surgery were analyzed to determine the relationship between mesorectal invasion depth and survival rates.
  • Results indicated that a cutoff of 6 mm for mesorectal invasion significantly correlated with survival: patients with <6 mm had a higher 5-year survival rate compared to those with >=6 mm, confirming mesorectal invasion as an important prognostic factor.

Article Abstract

Objective: To determine the significance of the extent of mesorectal tumor invasion as a prognostic factor for T3 rectal cancer patients.

Summary Background Data: There is controversy as to which primary lesion characteristics, other than regional lymph node involvement, in T3 rectal cancer are reliable prognostic factors.

Patients And Methods: The extent of mesorectal tumor invasion was evaluated using 2 data sets comprising 196 and 247 patients undergoing curative surgery at separate institutes. When the outer aspect of the muscular layer was not identifiable, an estimate was obtained by drawing a straight line between the 2 break points of the muscular layer.

Results: We selected 6 mm as the optimal value for subclassification of T3 rectal patients into 2 groups, based on the extent of mesorectal invasion, using the first data set. The overall 5-year survival rate was significantly higher in patients with <6 mm than in those with > or =6 mm of mesorectal invasion (72% versus 50%; P< 0.01). Similarly, in the second data set, the overall 5-year survival rates of patients with mesorectal invasion <6 mm and > or =6 mm were 59% and 37%, respectively (P < 0.01). In both data sets, multivariate analyses verified the extent of mesorectal invasion to be an independent prognostic factor, together with nodal involvement. Regarding positive nodal involvement and mesorectal invasion > or =6 mm as risk factors, the overall 5-year survival rates with none, one, and both of these factors were 84%, 61%, and 38%, respectively, in the first data set (P < 0.01). Prognostic results were similar for the second data set.

Conclusion: Extent of mesorectal invasion, based on a 6-mm cutoff value, is useful for subclassification of T3 rectal cancer patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448973PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000205627.05769.08DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

extent mesorectal
24
mesorectal invasion
24
rectal cancer
16
mesorectal tumor
12
tumor invasion
12
prognostic factor
12
data set
12
5-year survival
12
invasion
9
invasion prognostic
8

Similar Publications

Background: Treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) involves neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), followed by total mesorectal excision. Examining the response to treatment is one of the most important factors in the follow-up of patients; therefore, in this study, radiomics patterns derived from pretreatment computed tomography images in rectal cancer and its relationship with treatment response measurement criteria have been investigated.

Methods: Fifty patients with rectal adenocarcinoma who were candidates for nCRT and surgery were included.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Survival after surgery beyond total mesorectal excision for primary locally advanced rectal cancer, a population-based study.

Eur J Surg Oncol

December 2024

Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet and Division of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

Background: The aim of this study was to compare relative survival in non-metastatic rectal cancer clinically staged as T3-T4 requiring beyond total mesorectal excision (TME) to that after standard TME.

Methods: This population-based study included all patients operated with anterior resection, abdominoperineal excision or Hartmann's procedure for non-metastatic rectal cancer clinically staged as T3-T4 in Sweden between 2009 and 2018. Relative survival was analysed in relation to surgery beyond TME (bTME), which was subcategorized as bTME- and bTME + to account for extent of resection.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

. .PURPOSETo provide evidence-based guidance for clinicians who treat patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to enhance surgical practice by predicting anatomical structures within the surgical field, thereby supporting surgeons' experiences and cognitive skills. Preserving and utilising nerves as critical guiding structures is paramount in rectal cancer surgery. Hence, we developed a deep learning model based on U-Net to automatically segment nerves.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: To some extent, robotic technique does offer certain benefits in rectal cancer surgery than laparoscopic one, while remains a topic of ongoing debate for rectal cancer patients who had undergone neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT).

Methods: Potential studies published until January 2024 were obtained from Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase and PubMed. Dichotomous and continuous variables were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% their confidence intervals (CIs), respectively.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!