Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management guidelines recommend regular treatment with one or more long-acting bronchodilators for patients with moderate to severe COPD.

Objective: To compare the onset and duration of action of formoterol and tiotropium in patients with COPD.

Methods: This randomized, multicentre, open-label crossover study in 38 patients with COPD (mean age 64 years; mean FEV(1) 55% predicted) assessed the effect of 7 days of treatment with formoterol (12 microg b.i.d. via Foradil Aerolizer) vs. tiotropium (18 microg o.d. via Spiriva HandiHaler) on lung function measured over a period of 12 h after the first dose on day 1 and the last dose on day 8.

Results: The primary efficacy variable, FEV(1)-AUC during the first 2 h post-dose (FEV(1)-AUC(10-120 min)), was significantly higher for formoterol compared with tiotropium, with between-treatment differences of 124 ml (p = 0.016) after the first dose and 80 ml (p = 0.036) after 7 days' treatment in favour of formoterol. FEV(1) measured 12 h after inhalation did not differ statistically significantly between treatments. Adverse events occurred in 2 (5%) patients after treatment with formoterol and in 5 (12%) patients after treatment with tiotropium.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates faster onset of action and greater bronchodilation of formoterol vs. tiotropium for bronchodilation within the first 2 h of inhalation (FEV(1)-AUC(10-120 min)) and comparable bronchodilation 12 h post-inhalation in patients with moderate to severe COPD.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000091996DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

formoterol tiotropium
12
patients moderate
12
moderate severe
12
onset duration
8
duration action
8
action formoterol
8
tiotropium patients
8
severe copd
8
treatment formoterol
8
dose day
8

Similar Publications

Objective: This work aims to explore the effectiveness and safety of doxofylline in asthma treatment.

Data Sources: Relevant studies published before March 2023 were retrieved from EMBASE, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Web of Science databases.

Study Selections: Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2) was applied to determine the quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!