Police chiefs' perceptions of the regulation of firearms.

Am J Prev Med

Department of Adult Counseling, Health, and Vocational Education, College and Graduate School of Education, Health, and Human Services, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio 44242-001, USA.

Published: April 2006

Background: This national study assessed police chiefs' support for various types of firearm control measures, perceptions regarding firearms as a public health problem, and the likelihood of initiating firearm control advocacy activities.

Methods: A 29-item survey instrument was developed to assess respondents' likelihood of firearm policy support, interest, exposure, involvement with firearm control advocacy, and demographic and background characteristics. The survey was sent out in spring 2005 using a three-wave mailing to a national random sample of 600 police chiefs in cities with populations greater than 25,000 in 2002 and 2003.

Results: The majority of responding police chiefs supported 11 out of 14 proposed firearm control policies. Most police chiefs (62%) believed that the government should do everything it can to keep handguns out of the hands of criminals, even if it makes it more difficult for law-abiding citizens to purchase handguns. Police chiefs were not likely to participate in the majority of firearm control advocacy activities. The advocacy activities that police chiefs were most likely to participate in were meeting with state legislators (52%) and writing a letter to a legislator in relation to gun control (44%).

Conclusions: Police chiefs support several potentially important firearm control policies. This suggests the need to evaluate interventions aimed at increasing their role in shaping policy on this important public health issue.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2005.11.009DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

firearm control
24
police chiefs
24
control advocacy
12
police
8
police chiefs'
8
public health
8
control policies
8
chiefs participate
8
advocacy activities
8
firearm
7

Similar Publications

Horses of different ages may have to be killed on-farm for purposes other than slaughter (where slaughter is defined as killing for human consumption) either individually (i.e. on-farm killing of unproductive, injured or terminally ill animals) or on a large-scale (i.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Valuing the benefits of reducing firearm violence in the United States.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

January 2025

Harris School of Public Policy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637.

Justifying a proposed government regulation intended to reduce firearm violence requires a conceptually sound estimate of the monetized value of that impact and how that value is distributed across the population. Some previous estimates do not serve as a valid basis for policy evaluation or are out of date. A nationally representative survey was conducted by the AP-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research in August 2022 (n = 660).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!