Rapid detection of candidaemia is crucial for timely antifungal chemotherapy. However, the sensitivity of automated blood culture (BC) systems has been questioned. Blind subculture might increase detection rate and possibly also reduce time to detection of candidaemia. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of blind subcultures in patients deemed at high risk of candidaemia. BCs were processed by the BacT/Alert BC system, and during a 5-y period (1998-2003) subculture on the third d of incubation was performed for patients selected by clinical and microbiological assessment. A total of 79,165 BCs were drawn during the study period. 2154 BCs from 285 patients were selected for subculture. 103 (4.8%) BCs from 52 patients were yeast positive; 71 were detected positive prior to the planned subculture, 25 were positive on subculture, and 7 were negative on subculture, but became positive during further incubation. The 25 BCs positive on subculture originated from 14 patients, 11 of whom had already been diagnosed with candidaemia during the previous 14 d. Thus, a primary diagnosis of candidaemia was obtained by subculture in only 3 (1.1%) of the 285 patients selected. In conclusion, in our clinical setting blind subculture did not materially increase the detection of candidaemia, but helped to document persistent infection in a subset of cases.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00365540500388842DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

detection candidaemia
16
patients selected
12
subculture
9
high risk
8
blind subculture
8
increase detection
8
285 patients
8
subculture positive
8
positive subculture
8
patients
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!