A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Reproducibility of the Dutch version of the Voice Handicap Index. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to test the reliability of the Dutch translation of the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) by conducting a test-retest analysis with 104 patients suffering from voice issues.
  • There was no significant difference in VHI scores between male and female patients, and the scores from the two tests showed a strong correlation (r=0.95).
  • A difference of 14 points in a patient’s VHI score at two different times was deemed significant, suggesting good reproducibility of the VHI for clinical assessments.

Article Abstract

Objective: To investigate the reproducibility of the Dutch translation of the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) by performing a test-retest study. To determine the relationship between the test-retest differences and the VHI scores.

Patients And Methods: A group of 104 patients (56 male, 48 female) with voice complaints completed the VHI twice with a mean interval of 13 days.

Results: There were no differences in scores between male and female patients. There was a good correlation between the first and the second measurement (r=0.95). The difference between two VHI scores of any one patient and the total score were not related. We found that a 14-point difference in total score of the Dutch VHI for 1 patient at two points in time is significant.

Conclusion: The Dutch version of the VHI has a good reproducibility. When used for clinical evaluation studies of patients with voice complaints, a difference of 14 points between two measurements is significant.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000089613DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

reproducibility dutch
8
dutch version
8
voice handicap
8
male female
8
voice complaints
8
total score
8
vhi
6
voice
4
version voice
4
handicap objective
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!