A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Radiofrequency ablation of osteoid osteoma in the upper extremity. | LitMetric

Radiofrequency ablation of osteoid osteoma in the upper extremity.

J Hand Surg Am

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.

Published: February 2006

Purpose: To examine the results of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of osteoid osteoma in the upper extremity.

Methods: Twenty-nine patients with a clinical and radiographic diagnosis of an upper-extremity osteoid osteoma were referred for treatment between 1990 and 2003. All had computed tomography-guided percutaneous RFA performed by the senior investigator. Records were reviewed for patient age and gender, lesion size and location, prior treatment, and pathology results. Outcomes were determined by questionnaire via mail or telephone. Complete success was defined as complete resolution of pain without further treatment. Partial success was defined as occasional pain with activities that did not require another procedure. Failure was defined as recurrence, no change in symptoms, and/or the need for another procedure.

Results: Follow-up data were available for 25 patients at a minimum of 1 year. Lesion locations included 17 humerus, 5 scapula, 2 radius, 1 ulna. Results for 19 patients were rated completely successful, 4 were rated partially successful, and 2 were rated failures. Two patients whose results were not completely successful received decreased RFA temperature or duration because of the proximity of a neurovascular bundle. There were no complications. Outcomes did not correlate with any patient or tumor characteristics.

Conclusions: Radiofrequency ablation is a safe and effective treatment for most osteoid osteomas in the shoulder, arm, and forearm. Lesions that do not allow a safe distance between the electrode and a major neurovascular structure may require surgical excision. This may be of particular importance in lesions of the hand and carpus.

Type Of Study/level Of Evidence: Therapeutic, Level IV.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2005.10.012DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

radiofrequency ablation
12
osteoid osteoma
12
osteoma upper
8
success defined
8
completely successful
8
successful rated
8
osteoid
4
ablation osteoid
4
upper extremity
4
extremity purpose
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!