A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Comparison of 25 and 27 gauge needle in spinal anesthesia learning curve for anesthesia residency training. | LitMetric

Comparison of 25 and 27 gauge needle in spinal anesthesia learning curve for anesthesia residency training.

J Med Assoc Thai

Department of Anesthesiology and Clinical Epidemiological Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Published: November 2005

Background And Rationale: Size of spinal needle may be a factor which influences the success rate of spinal anesthesia.

Objectives: To compare learning curves of using 25G and 27G quincke spinal needle for spinal anesthesia.

Setting: Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital.

Design: Prospective randomized control trial.

Material And Method: Ten new first year anesthesia residents were randomized to 2 groups: Group I (n = 5) used 25G Quincke spinal needle, Group II (n = 5) used 27G Quincke spinal needle to perform 200 consecutive cases of spinal anesthesia. Number of success and failure was recorded by each individual resident anonymously. The learning curves of plotted by cumulative sum of success rate revealed an initial rapid improvement of success during the first 20 cases in both groups. The overall success rate of group I was 84% (95CI, 66.5-100) and group II was 87% (95%CI, 61.5-100); p = 0.89. The widest difference between the 2 learning curves at 20 attempts intervals was at the twentieth attempts with a success rate of 76.0% VS 65.0% in group I and group II respectively; p = 0.54.

Conclusion: The learning curves of spinal anesthesia using 25G and 27G Quincke spinal needle showed rapid improvement of success rate at the first 20 spinal block and high overall success rate with no significant difference between the groups.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

success rate
24
spinal needle
20
learning curves
16
quincke spinal
16
spinal anesthesia
12
27g quincke
12
spinal
11
needle spinal
8
success
8
rate spinal
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!