Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Formerly considered to be a salvage or last resort technique before nephrectomy, ureterocalicostomy can be indicated in certain well defined situations, when strictly dependent drainage of urine is essential. Due to its particular indications, this procedure is rarely performed and operators have limited experience. The authors report 17 cases of ureterocalicostomy performed in 16 patients: 8 cases obtained an excellent long-term result with absence of clinical signs, urinary tract infection and proximal dilatation of the neo-junction. 4 cases obtained a good result with resolution of clinical symptoms and bacteriological signs and improvement of the dilatation on intravenous urography. 3 cases obtained a poor result with persistence of clinical symptoms and dilatation on intravenous urography. 2 nephrectomies were subsequently performed 4 years and 10 years after ureterocalicostomy for non-functioning kidney and for chronic pyelonephritis.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!