We report on a case of stiffness of the knee following reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament caused by a Transfix implant (Manufacturer, City, State) protruding into the medial retinacular area. After a skiing injury, a 56-year-old woman had a complete rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament along with a tear of the medial collateral ligament. She had an immediate anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A hinged brace was put on postoperatively. She presented to this institution 2 months after surgery with pain, stiffness, and decreased range of motion. Magnetic resonance imaging showed protrusion of the bioabsorbable implant in the medial retinacular area. Scar tissue was seen around the tip of the implant, medial retinacular area, and in the medial gutter. The terminal end of the protruding screw and the excess of scar tissue were removed arthroscopically. At the end of surgery, her on-table range of motion of the knee was 0 degrees to 120 degrees. She recovered well after physiotherapy and at the 3-month follow-up she was pain free and had virtually full flexion. The knee seemed stable and the medial collateral ligament showed signs of healing. Caution has to be exercised in the choice of size and angle of insertion of the Transfix implant.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2005.11.003DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

anterior cruciate
16
cruciate ligament
16
transfix implant
12
medial retinacular
12
retinacular area
12
ligament reconstruction
8
medial collateral
8
collateral ligament
8
range motion
8
implant medial
8

Similar Publications

Background: To summarize the statistical performance of machine learning in predicting revision, secondary knee injury, or reoperations following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), and to provide a general overview of the statistical performance of these models.

Methods: Three online databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE) were searched from database inception to February 6, 2024, to identify literature on the use of machine learning to predict revision, secondary knee injury (e.g.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: While allografts are commonly used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), evidence to guide specific allograft selection is lacking.

Purpose: To compare clinical and graft failure rates after ACLR using soft tissue-only allografts and bone-soft tissue allografts in adults.

Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Failure, persistent knee instability, and reinjury rates after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction are still concerns. Biomechanical investigations have highlighted the role of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) as a crucial knee stabilizer, and clinical outcomes after combined ACL and ALL reconstruction appear to indicate the success of the procedure.

Purpose: To compare the functional outcomes, return-to-sport (RTS) rate, and complications between combined ACL and ALL reconstruction and isolated ACL reconstruction.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) stress techniques-including single-leg stress radiographs, Telos, and KT-1000 arthrometer-are highly accessible and can provide additional diagnostic information to assess ACL and ACL graft integrity. The degree of anterior tibial translation (ATT) may be useful in guiding treatment when a diagnosis on magnetic resonance imaging is not conclusive or for judging if additional treatments, such as anterolateral complex augmentation, may be necessary.

Purpose/hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of increasing posterior tibial slope (PTS) on baseline tibial position (BTP) and side-to-side differences (SSD) in ATT.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Tobacco use is a known modifiable risk factor for postoperative complications and revision surgery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Previous studies focus on tobacco as a broad categorization of traditional smoking, smokeless tobacco, and other forms of nicotine use. It is unclear if differences in the type of nicotine used lead to similar adverse outcomes after ACLR.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!