A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Theophylline as 'add-on' therapy to cetirizine in patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study. | LitMetric

Background: Chronic urticaria is a prevalent condition associated with substantial disability. Its pathogenesis is not clearly understood and is divided into autoimmune and chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU). We investigated if the non-specific phosphodiesterase inhibitor theophylline could provide additional benefit to the histamine-1 receptor (H-1R) antagonist cetirizine in CIU.

Methods: This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel study. Patients were randomized to receive either cetirizine and theophylline (200 mg twice daily; group A, 67 subjects) or cetirizine and placebo for 6 months (group B, 67 subjects). Group A patients took theophylline for 6 more months. Response was assessed by visual analog scale (VAS) and treatment effectiveness score (TES). Blood theophylline levels were also determined at visit t=1 and t=7.

Results: The study was completed by 54 of the 67 patients (80.6%) in group A and 51 of the 67 patients (76.1%) in group B. The physician VAS values for group A were lower after t=3, while the patient VAS values were decreased after t=2. The physician and patient TES values in group A were statistically higher (p<0.05) at all time points except for t=1. At least 1 month of theophylline addition was necessary to obtain statistically significant benefit over cetirizine, and reducing theophylline by 50% during phase 2 did not alter this benefit. Pruritus values were reduced, but not statistically significant.

Conclusions: Addition of theophylline to conventional H-1R antagonists was well tolerated without any adverse effects and provided considerable additional benefit in the management of CIU.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000091171DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

chronic idiopathic
8
idiopathic urticaria
8
double-blind placebo-controlled
8
group subjects
8
group patients
8
vas values
8
values group
8
group
7
theophylline
5
patients
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!