AI Article Synopsis

  • Abnormal right ventricular apical pacing can worsen cardiac function, potentially increasing mortality in patients with heart failure who have permanent pacemakers.
  • Research involving five patients with either advanced AV block or sick sinus syndrome compared the effects of pacing at different sites (RVA, RVS, RVOT, and CS) on left ventricular (LV) function.
  • Findings indicated that pacing at the right ventricular septum (RVS) improved LV contractility and relaxation compared to pacing at the right ventricular apex (RVA), suggesting RVS pacing may be a better option.

Article Abstract

Background: Abnormal activation of the ventricles via right ventricular apical pacing deteriorates cardiac function, which may explain the increased mortality of patients with congestive heart failure receiving permanent pacemakers. We hypothesized that pacing at alternative sites may cause less detrimental effects on the cardiac function.

Methods: Five symptomatic patients with either advanced AV block (n = 4) or sick sinus syndrome with normal left ventricular (LV) function (n = 1) were studied. During cardiac catheterization, LV pressure was recorded with a high-fidelity catheter-tipped transducer. Baseline rhythms were sinus rhythm or VVI pacing. Sequential VDD pacing with variable AV intervals was performed at the right ventricular apex (RVA), right ventricular septum (RVS), right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) and coronary sinus (CS). LV systolic function was assessed by calculating dP/dt(max) and LV diastolic function was indexed by calculating the exponential isovolumic relaxation constant (Tau). Percentage changes (mean +/- SE) from baseline to pacing were measured.

Results: RVA pacing reduced dP/dt(max) (-0.8 +/- 8.4%) and prolonged Tau (7.0 +/- 5.6%); RVS pacing enhanced dP/dt(max) (20.7 +/- 15.3%) and shortened Tau (-10.4 +/- 9%); RVOT pacing reduced dP/dt(max) (-8.0 +/- 20.0%) and shortened Tau (-6.0 +/- 12.2%); CS pacing reduced dP/dt(max) (-11.7 +/- 13.0%) and prolonged Tau (10.5 +/- 11.9%). Our results demonstrated that different pacing sites have different effects on LV contractility and relaxation in patients with normal LV function.

Conclusion: Since pacing at the RVS preferably increased LV dP/dt(max) and shortened Tau, it may be a better alternative than the RVA.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1726-4901(09)70108-xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pacing
12
pacing reduced
12
reduced dp/dtmax
12
shortened tau
12
+/-
9
left ventricular
8
systolic function
8
relaxation patients
8
patients advanced
8
advanced block
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!