Lateral asymmetry in the ABR of neonates: evidence and mechanisms.

Hear Res

UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Division of Head & Neck Surgery, 62-132 Center for Health Science, Box 951624, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1624, United States.

Published: February 2006

Lateralized processing of auditory stimuli occurs at the level of the auditory cortex but differences in function between the left and right sides are not clear at lower levels of the auditory system. The current study is designed to (1) investigate asymmetric auditory function at the ear and brainstem in human infants and (2) investigate possible mechanisms for asymmetry at these levels. Study 1 evaluated auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) in response to high and low-level clicks presented to the right and left ears of neonates. Wave V was significantly larger in amplitude and waves III and V were shorter in latency when the ABR was generated in the right ear. Study 2 investigated two possible mechanisms of such asymmetry by (a) using contralateral white noise masking to activate the medial olivocochlear system and (b) increasing stimulus rate to reveal neural conduction and synaptic mechanisms. ABR wave V, evoked by clicks to the left ear, showed a greater reduction in amplitude with contralateral noise than the response evoked from the right ear. No systematic asymmetries in ABR latencies or amplitudes were found with increased stimulus rate. We conclude that (1) the click-evoked ABR in neonates demonstrates asymmetric auditory function with a small but significant right ear advantage and (2) asymmetric activation of the medial olivocochlear system, specifically greater contralateral suppression of ABR produced by the left ear, is a possible mechanism for asymmetry.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2005.12.003DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

abr neonates
8
asymmetric auditory
8
auditory function
8
mechanisms asymmetry
8
medial olivocochlear
8
olivocochlear system
8
stimulus rate
8
left ear
8
abr
6
auditory
6

Similar Publications

Objective:  The objectives of the study were to (i) evaluate the effectiveness of wideband absorbance (WBA) at ambient pressure (WBA), tympanic peak pressure (WBA), and 0 daPa (WBA) to identify conductive hearing loss (CHL) in infants and (ii) compare the sensitivity and specificity of the three WBA tests with that of high-frequency tympanometry (HFT) and transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE).

Method:  A total of 31 ears with hearing thresholds no greater than 20 dB HL (reference group from 20 infants [mean age: 3.1 weeks]) and 47 ears with CHL from 31 infants (mean age: 3.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: This study investigates the pandemic's impact on newborn hearing screening (NBHS) and access to hearing services for children in Utah. Specifically, it explores the differences in NBHS rates, diagnostic hearing testing, early intervention enrollment, and congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) screening before and during the pandemic.

Methods: Utilizing a comprehensive statewide Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) database, we analyzed data from January 2017 to December 2021, excluding a 6-month period preceding March 16, 2020, to eliminate potential confounders related to pandemic onset.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Universal newborn hearing screening has been successfully implemented in many places around the world, and it is recommended that cases with risk factors for hearing loss be followed-up regardless of hearing screening results. However, there is a need for clarity regarding the recommended rate of follow-up and which tests should be performed. The aim of this study was to assess the audiologic follow-up program for the group with risk factors.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The reported data on European universal neonatal hearing screening (UNHS) practices tend to be scarce, despite the fact that the European Union project, EUScreen, collected unofficial data from 38 collaborating European institutions. The objectives of this systematic review were as follows: (a) to identify the most recent (in a 20-year span) literature information about UNHS programs in Europe and (b) to provide data on the procedures used to assess the population, the intervention policies, and on the estimated prevalence of congenital hearing loss with emphasis on the bilateral hearing loss cases. Queries were conducted via the Pubmed, Scopus and Google Scholar databases for the time period of 2004-2024.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!