AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the phylogenetic relationships of chaetognaths (arrow worms) using new ribosomal RNA sequences, contributing to our understanding of bilaterian evolution.
  • Results indicate three main monophyletic groups among chaetognaths and suggest changes in their classification, particularly that certain groups should not be considered as separate families anymore.
  • The findings also reveal that some previously accepted hypotheses about chaetognath relationships are incorrect, prompting a reevaluation of morphological traits that may misrepresent evolutionary connections due to homoplasy.

Article Abstract

While the phylogenetic position of Chaetognatha has became central to the question of early bilaterian evolution, the internal systematics of the phylum are still not clear. The phylogenetic relationships of the chaetognaths were investigated using newly obtained small subunit ribosomal RNA nuclear 18S (SSU rRNA) sequences from 16 species together with 3 sequences available in GenBank. As previously shown with the large subunit ribosomal RNA 28S gene, two classes of Chaetognatha SSU rRNA gene can be identified, suggesting a duplication of the whole ribosomal cluster; allowing the rooting of one class of genes by another in phylogenetic analyses. Maximum Parsimony, Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian analyses of the molecular data, and statistical tests showed (1) that there are three main monophyletic groups: Sagittidae/Krohnittidae, Spadellidae/Pterosagittidae, and Eukrohniidae/Heterokrohniidae, (2) that the group of Aphragmophora without Pterosagittidae (Sagittidae/Krohnittidae) is monophyletic, (3) the Spadellidae/Pterosagittidae and Eukrohniidae/Heterokrohniidae families are very likely clustered, (4) the Krohnittidae and Pterosagittidae groups should no longer be considered as families as they are included in other groups designated as families, (5) suborder Ctenodontina is not monophyletic and the Flabellodontina should no longer be considered as a suborder, and (6) the Syngonata/Chorismogonata and the Monophragmophora/Biphragmophora hypotheses are rejected. Such conclusions are considered in the light of morphological characters, several of which are shown to be prone to homoplasy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2005.12.004DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

molecular data
8
subunit ribosomal
8
ribosomal rna
8
ssu rrna
8
spadellidae/pterosagittidae eukrohniidae/heterokrohniidae
8
longer considered
8
systematics chaetognatha
4
chaetognatha light
4
light molecular
4
data duplicated
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!