Classification and diagnosis of congenital craniofacial cleft deformities are helpful in discerning the severity of the deformity and providing guidance for surgical repair. Eighty-one cases of congenital craniofacial cleft deformity were analyzed using the Tessier classification. Depending on the location, status of the deformity, and results of examinations such as computed tomography, according to the range affected, the location and status of the deformity were designated by the STO classification, with S for skin, T for soft tissue, and O for os (craniofacial bone). The severity of the deformity is delineated by Arabic numerals. The analysis of 81 cases by the STO classification method showed that suborbital deformities mainly were Tessier 3 and 4 clefts (24.70%) and supraorbital deformities mainly were Tessier 9 and 10 clefts (38.27%). There was no definite regular pattern for the affected extent of tissues. STO classification can be a supplement to Tessier classification and can provide references for the surgical repair of craniofacial cleft deformity.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.scs.0000194171.91421.b8 | DOI Listing |
J Craniofac Surg
January 2025
Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, John H. Stroger Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, IL.
Median craniofacial hypoplasia is characterized by tissue deficiency of the midline facial structures and/or brain. Patients can present with a wide variety of facial differences that may or may not require operative intervention. Common reconstructive procedures include cleft lip and/or palate repair, rhinoplasty, and orthognathic surgery, among others.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Craniofac Surg
October 2024
Division of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, John H. Stroger Hospital of Cook County, Chicago, IL.
Median craniofacial hypoplasia is characterized by tissue deficiency of the midline facial structures and/or brain. Patients can present with a wide variety of facial differences that may or may not require operative intervention. Common reconstructive procedures include cleft lip and/or palate repair, rhinoplasty, and orthognathic surgery, among others.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCleft Palate Craniofac J
January 2025
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Objective: Buccal myomucosal flap procedures have become a critical tool in the armamentarium of the cleft surgeon. Mastering this technique is complex and providing sufficient training opportunities presents significant challenges. Our study details the design, development, and evaluation of a low-cost, high-fidelity buccal myomucosal flap surgical simulator.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCleft Palate Craniofac J
January 2025
Center for Craniofacial Disorders, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Evaluate predictors for attendance and adherence to speech evaluations and determine factors that influence longitudinal care for patients with cleft palate and craniofacial differences. Retrospective, observational cohort study. Tertiary children's hospital.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCleft Palate Craniofac J
January 2025
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkey.
Objective: The aim of the present research was to assess and compare the piriform aperture dimensions of subjects with a unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) and those of a control group using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Design: CBCT data of 40 subjects with a complete UCLP (28 males and 12 females, with a mean age of 17.21 ± 5.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!