Background: It has been hypothesized that a degree of coercion is a necessary component in using outpatient commitment to attain therapeutic outcome for those people subject to mental health law. However, what degree of coercion is required and how it is sustained is poorly understood. There is speculation that patients' recognition of beneficial as well as unwanted aspects of outpatient commitment (ambivalence) maybe an indicator that the necessary level of coercion has been achieved to facilitate a therapeutic outcome.
Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the level of coercion perceived by those under outpatient commitment in New Zealand. Emphasis was given to consideration of the presence of ambivalence and the role of interactive processes, including procedural justice, in influencing patients' perceptions of coercion.
Method: A cross-sectional comparative study was undertaken to compare the perceptions of coercion of patients on outpatient commitment (n = 69) to a matched sample of voluntary outpatients (n = 69), using the Perceived Coercion Scale. The influence of a range of variables, including patients' knowledge of and beliefs concerning outpatient commitment, were considered.
Results: Although the level of coercion for involuntary outpatients was relatively low, it was significantly higher than that experienced by voluntary outpatients. Yet involuntary outpatients were more likely to espouse benefits of outpatient commitment. Although there was an inverse correlation between perceptions of procedural justice and perceived coercion, procedural justice did not feature in the linear regression analysis.
Discussion: In the New Zealand context, involuntary outpatients hold contrasting views to outpatient commitment. We suggest that this ambivalence is an indicator that the degree of coercion is suffice to achieve therapeutic outcome. Furthermore, this study suggests the impact of procedural justice on patients' perceptions of coercion may be more crucial during admission to hospital than in the context of on-going community care.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2004.07.004 | DOI Listing |
Eur Psychiatry
January 2025
Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Background: Temperature increases in the context of climate change affect numerous mental health outcomes. One such relevant outcome is involuntary admissions as these often relate to severe (life)threatening psychiatric conditions. Due to a shortage of studies into this topic, relationships between mean ambient temperature and involuntary admissions have remained largely elusive.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPsychiatr Serv
January 2025
Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla.
Objective: The use of court-ordered mental health treatment through programs such as assisted outpatient treatment (AOT) carries substantial ramifications for the welfare of individuals with serious mental health conditions.
Methods: In this review, the authors used a narrative methodology and performed an interpretive synthesis of existing U.S.
J Healthc Manag
January 2025
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Irvine, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, Orange, California.
Goal: Excessively lengthy wait times for appointments with clinicians are a major source of frustration for patients, and difficulties with access represent a public health problem facing populations across all societies. As delays in care have been associated with inferior outcomes, same-day appointments have been proposed as a patient-centric means of improving healthcare delivery. However, this paradigm represents a radical shift from conventional scheduling tactics, and skepticism has long existed regarding its feasibility and real-world applicability to clinical practice.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPsychiatriki
December 2024
Mobile Mental Health Unit of the prefectures of Ioannina and Thesprotia, Society for the Promotion of Mental Health in Epirus, Ioannina, Greece.
Clin Orthop Relat Res
December 2024
Orthopedic Surgery, Woodlands Health, National Healthcare Group, Singapore.
Background: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a common and disabling condition that often carries severe psychosocial implications. Chronic illness-related shame has emerged as a substantial psychosocial factor affecting individuals with knee OA, but it is unclear how chronic illness-related shame is associated with the long-term clinical and psychosocial outcomes in individuals with knee OA.
Questions/purposes: (1) Does a higher level of shame correlate with worse clinical and psychosocial outcomes at baseline among individuals with knee OA? (2) Is a higher level of shame at baseline associated with worse clinical and psychosocial outcomes at 4-month and 12-month follow-up among individuals with knee OA? (3) Are sociodemographic characteristics correlated with levels of shame among individuals with knee OA?
Methods: Between June 2021 and February 2022, we screened 977 patients based on the inclusion criteria of (1) age 45 years or older, (2) independent in community mobility with or without walking aids, (3) proficient in English or Chinese language, and (4) met the clinical criteria for OA diagnosis outlined by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!