A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Survival of diced cartilage grafts: an experimental study. | LitMetric

Survival of diced cartilage grafts: an experimental study.

Plast Reconstr Surg

Aesthetic and Plastic Surgery Institute, University of California, Irvine, California, USA.

Published: January 2006

Background: Use of diced cartilage grafts in rhinoplasty surgery has recently undergone a dramatic resurgence. Some authors recommend wrapping diced cartilage with oxidized methylcellulose (i.e., Surgicel). Others prefer wrapping diced cartilage with autogenous deep temporal fascia. This study was designed to compare the behavior of diced cartilage grafts as an isolated entity or when wrapped with either Surgicel or deep temporal fascia.

Methods: Septal cartilage and deep temporal fascia were obtained from five patients in this institutional review board-approved study. The cartilage was diced into 0.5-mm pieces and implanted into subcutaneous dorsal skin pockets of Rowlett nude rats as isolated diced cartilage grafts, or wrapped in Surgicel or deep temporal fascia. Pieces of Surgicel and fascia were implanted alone as controls. The specimens were harvested at 8 weeks; processed by thin-section histology; stained with hematoxylin and eosin, Masson's trichrome, glial fibrillary acidic protein, safranin-O, and Evans van Gieson; and evaluated to determine cartilage viability and architectural characteristics.

Results: Diced cartilage wrapped in Surgicel yielded the lowest percentage viability and minimal staining with hematoxylin and eosin, trichrome tissue, safranin-O, and Evans van Gieson stains. Diced cartilage grafts wrapped in fascia had the greatest percentage of viable cartilage. The grafts wrapped in deep temporal fascia also demonstrated the strongest staining with the aforementioned stains. Differences in uptake of glial fibrillary acidic protein were not noticeable between the three groups. However, absolute numbers of nucleated lacunae and basophilic lacunae were significantly higher for grafts wrapped in deep temporal fascia.

Conclusions: Diced cartilage grafts have reemerged as a viable method for nasal reconstruction in both primary and secondary rhinoplasty. Wrapping diced cartilage specimens contains the individual pieces and facilitates graft placement. Surgicel wraps appear to incite an inflammatory response and subsequent absorption of the cartilage. Fascia wraps appear to minimize inflammatory responses to the cartilage, thereby preserving healthy cartilage. This study demonstrates that deep temporal fascia is the preferred envelope with which to facilitate graft containment and maintain chondrocyte viability of diced cartilage grafts.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000195082.38311.f4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

diced cartilage
44
cartilage grafts
32
deep temporal
28
temporal fascia
20
cartilage
18
grafts wrapped
16
wrapping diced
12
wrapped surgicel
12
diced
11
grafts
9

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!