A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux among globus patients. | LitMetric

Diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux among globus patients.

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

Department of Otolaryngology, School of Medicine, Eulji University Medical Center, #280-1 Hagye 1-Dong, Nowon-Gu, Seoul, Korea.

Published: January 2006

Objective: Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is suggested as one of the most common etiologic factors of globus; currently, however, only a few tools are available to carry out effective diagnosis of LPR in clinics. The goal of this study was to assess the validity of reflux finding score (RFS), reflux symptom index (RSI), and symptom checklist-90-revision (SCL-90-R) as diagnostic methods for LPR.

Study Design And Setting: We selected 57 globus patients who were divided into test and control groups according to the results of 24-hour double-probe ambulatory pH monitoring. RFS, RSI, and SCL-90-R were then compared between the 2 groups, and the logical products of the 3 tests were also compared.

Results: RFS and RSI showed low specificity and there was no significant difference between the test and control groups. However, SCL-90-R revealed significantly high scores in the control group. The logical product of combining positive RFS and negative SCL-90-R was significantly different between the groups.

Conclusion: RFS and RSI are less valid as diagnostic tools for LPR when used independently. Patients with LPR are found to exhibit weaker psychological symptoms than non-LPR patients.

Ebm Rating: B-2b.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2005.08.025DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rfs rsi
12
laryngopharyngeal reflux
8
globus patients
8
test control
8
control groups
8
rfs
5
diagnosis laryngopharyngeal
4
reflux
4
reflux globus
4
patients objective
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!