Introduction: Decompressive craniectomy has demonstrated efficacy in reducing morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients with massive hemispheric cerebral infarction. However, little is known about the patterns of functional recovery that exist in patients after decompressive craniectomy, and controversy still exists as to whether craniotomy and infarct resection ("strokectomy") are appropriate alternatives to decompression alone. We therefore used functional magnetic resonance imaging (f-MRI) to assess the extent and location of functional recovery in patients after decompressive craniectomy for massive ischemic stroke.
Methods: f-MRI was obtained in three patients with massive nondominant cerebral infarction who had undergone decompressive craniectomy for severe cerebral edema 13 to 26 months previously. Brain activation was triggered by hand-gripping or foot- movement tasks. Imaging results were combined with periodic clinical follow-up to determine the extent of neurological recovery.
Results: Activation of the contralateral hemisphere was seen in the sensorimotor cortex, premotor, and supplementary motor areas. Lesser activation patterns were seen in equivalent regions of the infarcted hemisphere. Peri-infarct activation foci were seen in two of the three patients, but no activation occurred within the area of infarction as defined by the initial stroke seen on diffusion-weighted MRI. All three patients demonstrated some corresponding neurological improvement.
Conclusion: After massive hemispheric cerebral infarction requiring decompressive craniectomy, patients may experience functional recovery as a result of activation in both the infarcted and contralateral hemispheres. The evidence of functional recovery in peri-infarct regions suggests that decompression alone may be preferable to strokectomy where the risk of damage to adjacent nonischemic brain may be greater.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1385/NCC:3:3:216 | DOI Listing |
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)
January 2025
Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Background And Objectives: Decompressive hemicraniectomy is a common emergent surgery for patients with stroke, hemorrhage, or trauma. The typical incision is a reverse question mark (RQM); however, a retroauricular (RA) incision has been proposed as an alternative. The widespread adoption ofthe RA incision has been slowed by lack of familiarity and concerns over decompression efficacy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFStroke
January 2025
University of Lille, INSERM, CHU Lille, U1172- Lille Neuroscience and Cognition, France (C.C.).
After 30 years of disappointment, 2 randomized controlled trials investigating the effect of neurosurgical treatment on functional outcome in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage were published in 2024. The ENRICH trial (Early Minimally Invasive Removal of Intracerebral Hemorrhage) studied the efficacy of early minimally invasive hematoma removal in patients with lobar or anterior basal ganglia intracerebral hemorrhage, whereas the SWITCH trial investigated the effect of decompressive craniectomy without hematoma removal in severe deep intracerebral hemorrhage. In this critique article, we will discuss the main findings of these trials, their implications and future perspectives.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLancet
January 2025
Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Center, and Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg 79106, Germany.
Lancet
January 2025
NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia. Electronic address:
Lancet
January 2025
Neuro-Intensive Care Unit, Rothschild Foundation Hospital, 75019 Paris, France.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!