Four new MMPI Scales were constructed to identify Eysenck's personality factors of psychoticism, extraversion, and neuroticism as well as a lie score. The scales showed good construct validities against the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire and the Friedman Overlap Scales developed from items in the MMPI. The study also supported the construct validity of the Friedman overlap scales.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4902_7 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Development and validation of an MMPI-3 Antagonism scale.
Personal Disord
January 2025
Department of Psychological Science, Kent State University.
Antagonism is a personality domain located in most major trait models and is central to multiple personality disorders. This construct has been linked to many societally harmful externalizing behaviors (e.g.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDiagnosis of Pain Deception Using Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Based on XGBoost Machine Learning Algorithm: A Single-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.
Medicina (Kaunas)
December 2024
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 03312, Republic of Korea.
: Assessing pain deception is challenging due to its subjective nature. The main goal of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of pain deception using machine learning (ML) analysis with the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) scales, considering accuracy, precision, recall, and f1-score as diagnostic parameters. : This study was a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClinical Consultation in the Workplace: Are There Implications for Response Attitudes?
Psychol Belg
January 2025
DivPsi -PSP (Portuguese Police -Clinical Psychology Department), Unidade Especial de Polícia -Quinta das Águas Livres, 2605-197 Belas, Portugal.
The clinical-organizational context (where clinical psychology services are provided in the individuals' professional setting) has still been insufficiently approached in research, namely the influence it may have on the response attitudes of individuals undergoing psychological assessment. Our main goal is to find out if, when psychological assessment occurs in the workplace context, patients being assessed present specific response bias that may have implications for the clinical results and correlative decisions. Five hundred and ten adult participants grouped in two samples of ambulatory patients - Clinical-Organizational Sample (COS = 238) and Clinical Sample (CS = 272) - were assessed with the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-RF validity and substantive scales.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCAT-PD and MMPI-3 Validity Scales Detect Simulated Overreporting and Underreporting.
J Pers Assess
December 2024
Department of Psychology, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York.
Individuals can sway legal, medical, employment, or other decisions by dishonestly self-reporting on psychological tests. Accordingly, the Comprehensive Assessment of Traits relevant to Personality Disorder (CAT-PD) and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-3 (MMPI-3) include validity scales to detect overreporting and underreporting. Although many studies have empirically tested the validity scales of the MMPI-2 and the MMPI-2-RF, fewer have done so with the updated MMPI-3, and none with the CAT-PD.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClinical heterogeneity of feeding and eating disorders: using personality psychopathology to differentiate "simplex" and "complex" phenotypes.
BMC Psychiatry
December 2024
Unit of Psychiatry and Eating Disorders, Department of Medicine (DMED), University of Udine, Udine, 33100, Italy.
Article Synopsis
- The study aimed to explore the diversity of Feeding and Eating Disorders (FED) by examining how different symptoms and personality issues overlap, proposing that current classifications might not fully capture the complexity of these disorders.
- Researchers used Latent Profile Analysis on 109 patients, identifying three distinct profiles: low symptoms with no personality issues, high symptoms without dysfunction, and high symptoms with dysfunctional personality traits.
- Results showed noteworthy differences in BMI, eating disorder severity, and psychiatric diagnoses among these profiles, indicating that the most complex cases suffered the most severe symptoms and related issues, challenging traditional diagnostic categories.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!