A key problem of eukaryotic cell motility is the signaling mechanism of chemoattractant gradient sensing. Recent experiments have revealed the molecular correlate of gradient sensing: Frontness molecules, such as PI3P and Rac, localize at the front end of the cell, and backness molecules, such as Rho and myosin II, accumulate at the back of the cell. Importantly, this frontness-backness polarization occurs spontaneously even if the cells are exposed to uniform chemoattractant profiles. The spontaneous polarization suggests that the gradient sensing machinery undergoes a Turing bifurcation. This has led to several classical activator-inhibitor and activator-substrate models which identify the frontness molecules with the activator. Conspicuously absent from these models is any accounting of the backness molecules. This stands in sharp contrast to experiments which show that the backness pathways inhibit the frontness pathways. Here, we formulate a model based on the mutually inhibitory interaction between the frontness and backness pathways. The model builds upon the mutual inhibition model proposed by Bourne and coworkers [Xu et al., 2003. Divergent signals and cytoskeletal assemblies regulate self-organizing polarity in neutrophils. Cell 114, 201-214.]. We show that mutual inhibition alone, without the help of any positive feedback (autocatalysis), can trigger spontaneous polarization of the frontness and backness pathways. The spatial distribution of the frontness and backness molecules in response to inhibition and activation of the frontness and backness pathways are consistent with those observed in experiments. Furthermore, depending on the parameter values, the model yields spatial distributions corresponding to chemoattraction (frontness pathways in-phase with the external gradient) and chemorepulsion (frontness pathways out-of-phase with the external gradient). Analysis of the model suggests a mechanism for the chemorepulsion-to-chemoattraction transition observed in neurons.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.10.022DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

frontness backness
20
backness pathways
20
gradient sensing
16
spontaneous polarization
12
mutual inhibition
12
backness molecules
12
frontness pathways
12
frontness
10
model based
8
backness
8

Similar Publications

Vowel harmony is a phenomenon in which the vowels in a word share some features (e.g., frontness vs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Polarization is a crucial component in cell differentiation, development, and motility, but its details are not yet well understood. At the onset of cell locomotion, cells break symmetry to form well-defined cell fronts and rears. This polarity establishment varies across cell types: in cells, it is mediated by biochemical signaling pathways and can function in the absence of a cytoskeleton, while in keratocytes, it is tightly connected to cytoskeletal dynamics and mechanics.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A comparison of acoustic and articulatory parameters for the GOOSE vowel across British Isles Englishes.

J Acoust Soc Am

December 2019

Clinical Audiology Speech and Language Research Centre, Speech and Hearing Sciences, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh EH21 6UU, United Kingdom.

This study quantifies vocalic variation that cannot be measured from the acoustic signal alone and develops methods of standardisation and measurement of articulatory parameters for vowels. Articulatory-acoustic variation in the GOOSE vowel was measured across 3 regional accents of the British Isles using a total of 18 speakers from the Republic of Ireland, Scotland, and England, recorded with synchronous ultrasound tongue imaging, lip camera, and audio. Single co-temporal measures were taken of tongue-body height and backness, lip protrusion, F1, and F2.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

To stabilize neutrophil polarity, PIP3 and Cdc42 augment RhoA activity at the back as well as signals at the front.

J Cell Biol

July 2006

Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, and Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.

Chemoattractants like f-Met-Leu-Phe (fMLP) induce neutrophils to polarize by triggering divergent signals that promote the formation of protrusive filamentous actin (F-actin; frontness) and RhoA-dependent actomyosin contraction (backness). Frontness locally inhibits backness and vice versa. In neutrophil-like HL60 cells, blocking phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-tris-phosphate (PIP3) accumulation with selective inhibitors of PIP3 synthesis completely prevents fMLP from activating a PIP3-dependent kinase and Cdc42 but not from stimulating F-actin accumulation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Neutrophil polarization: spatiotemporal dynamics of RhoA activity support a self-organizing mechanism.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

March 2006

Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-2140, USA.

Chemoattractants like fMet-Leu-Phe (fMLP) induce neutrophils to polarize with phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (PIP3) and protrusive F-actin at the front and actomyosin contraction at the sides and back. RhoA and its downstream effector, myosin II, mediate the "backness" response, which locally inhibits the "frontness" response and constrains its location to one part of the cell. In living HL-60 cells, we used a fluorescent PIP3 probe or a single-chain FRET biosensor for RhoA-GTP to assess spatial distribution of frontness or backness responses, respectively, during the first 3 min after exposure to a uniform concentration of fMLP.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!