A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

CT in children with abdominal cancer: should we routinely include the pelvis? | LitMetric

Background: It has been suggested that the pelvis should not be habitually included on abdominal CT examinations, but the potential benefit of such a practice in childhood abdominal malignancies is unknown.

Objective: To estimate the yield and potential diagnostic benefit of abnormal findings on CT of the pelvis in children with malignant primary tumours in the upper abdomen.

Materials And Methods: From a paediatric tertiary referral hospital we retrospectively included patients having abdominal CT for primary upper abdominal tumours (1997-2004), the scan range routinely including the pelvis. We reviewed and tabulated any pelvic abnormality, and calculated group proportions with 95% confidence intervals.

Results: We identified 230 children (2 days to 17 years old, median 2.9 years). Six (2.6%; 95% CI 0.5-4.7%) had abnormalities in the pelvis that would not have affected clinical management. Four (1.7%; 95% CI 0.1-3.4%) had findings that might have influenced staging, but only one was not detected by other modalities within 1 week of the CT.

Conclusions: Our data suggest that diagnostically significant findings in the pelvis are rare; consequently, the habitual inclusion of the pelvis on abdominal CT for primary malignant tumours in the abdomen is not justified.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00247-005-0053-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

findings pelvis
8
abdominal primary
8
pelvis
6
abdominal
5
children abdominal
4
abdominal cancer
4
cancer routinely
4
routinely include
4
include pelvis?
4
pelvis? background
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!